Paper · 2014 · Acta Horticulturae

EFFECT OF DIVERSE LONG-TERM MINERAL FERTILIZATION ON FRUIT YIELD AND MINERAL CONTENT IN THE LEAVES OF HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY PLANTS

W. Stępień; T. Stępień; B. Koziński; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Since 1923 a long-term fertilization experiment has been carried out in one of the fields of the Experimental Station of the Warsaw Agricultural University in Skierniewice. Until now, this field has not been fertilized with organic fertilizers and no legumes have been grown there. Mineral CaNPK fertilizers have been applied each year according to the following scheme: O, CaNPK, NPK, PK, PN, KN. Since 1976, 90 kg N/ha in the form of (NH(4))(2)SO4, 60 kg P2O5 in the form of Ca(H(2)PO(4))(2) and 110 kg K2O in the form of KCI has been applied. The experiment with high-bush blueberry was set up in 1976 and carried out in 3 replications with 9 plants of each cultivar per plot. This paper presents growth and fruit yield of the blueberry plants in three periods: the first one from 1976 till 1988, the second one till 2005 and the third one till 2011. In the third period of the experiment, the rejuvenation pruning was additionally introduced by cutting back the plants at various heights. The greatest negative influence on yielding of blueberry plants was obtained from plants with liming plots (CaNPK) and without nitrogen fertilization (PK). The blueberry plants reaction to potassium fertilization was very weak. Despite of the low K content in the PN combination, the yield was only about 10% lower than in the NPK combination. On the plots without phosphorus fertilization, the yield was similar to that obtained from the plots fertilized with this component. The annual fertilization with P and K increased the levels of these components in the leaves, while liming increased the levels of Ca and Mg and decreased those of Fe, Zn and Mn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming under CaNPK reduced blueberry yield most strongly.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Treatment
liming plots (CaNPK)e0
Outcome
yieldinge0
Direction
negative influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest negative influence on yielding of blueberry plants was obtained from plants with liming plots (CaNPK) and without nitrogen fertilization (PK).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting nitrogen under PK reduced blueberry yield strongly.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Treatment
without nitrogen fertilization (PK)e0
Outcome
yieldinge0
Direction
negative influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest negative influence on yielding of blueberry plants was obtained from plants with liming plots (CaNPK) and without nitrogen fertilization (PK).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blueberry yield responded weakly to potassium fertilization.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Treatment
potassium fertilizatione0
Outcome
blueberry plants reactione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The blueberry plants reaction to potassium fertilization was very weak.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield in PN plots was about 10% lower than in NPK plots.

Taxon
blueberrye1
Treatment
PN combinatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
NPK combinatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Despite of the low K content in the PN combination, the yield was only about 10% lower than in the NPK combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1336 · show in text ↑
e1

“yielding of blueberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield without phosphorus fertilization was similar to fertilized plots.

Taxon
blueberrye1
Treatment
without phosphorus fertilizatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
plots fertilized with this componente0

Verbatim

e0

“On the plots without phosphorus fertilization, the yield was similar to that obtained from the plots fertilized with this component.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1469 · show in text ↑
e1

“yielding of blueberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual P fertilization increased leaf P levels.

Taxon
blueberrye1
Treatment
annual fertilization with Pe0
Outcome
levels of these components in the leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The annual fertilization with P and K increased the levels of these components in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1562 · show in text ↑
e1

“yielding of blueberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual K fertilization increased leaf K levels.

Taxon
blueberrye1
Treatment
annual fertilization with P and Ke0
Outcome
levels of these components in the leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The annual fertilization with P and K increased the levels of these components in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1562 · show in text ↑
e1

“yielding of blueberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming increased leaf Ca and Mg levels.

Taxon
blueberrye1
Treatment
liminge0
Outcome
levels of Ca and Mge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“liming increased the levels of Ca and Mg and decreased those of Fe, Zn and Mn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1647 · show in text ↑
e1

“yielding of blueberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming decreased leaf Fe, Zn, and Mn levels.

Taxon
blueberrye1
Treatment
liminge0
Outcome
those of Fe, Zn and Mne0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“liming increased the levels of Ca and Mg and decreased those of Fe, Zn and Mn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1647 · show in text ↑
e1

“yielding of blueberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1056 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · VacciniumResults differ

25 papers: 12 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

lime · yield · VacciniumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.