Paper · 2025 · Agriculture

The Effect of Foliar Calcium Spraying on Changes in the Mechanical Properties of Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.)

Piotr Komarnicki; Beata Cieniawska

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

One of the methods used to improve the durability of blueberry fruits is the application of nutrients through foliar feeding with calcium, which can improve the post-harvest mechanical parameters. This study proposed an optimal selection of calcium spray parameters, which enables a rational minimisation of the negative impact of agrochemicals in the environment. The qualitative evaluation of blueberry fruit showed lime spraying induces a significant effect on the increase in fruit size, especially at a pressure of 0.2 MPa and with AIXR nozzles compared to the control group. To assess the mechanical properties, a modern method of identifying the actual loads and maximum surface pressures generated by the picker during harvesting is presented. Compression and fruit rupture tests were also used to determine the pressure values and forces that are considered safe from the perspective of harvest quality. The comparative analysis of destructive compression and detachment tests confirmed that fruit firmness (Fp) was approximately 80% higher than the detachment force (Fpf), with peak pressures more than twice as high, suggesting that handpicking poses minimal risk of mechanical damage. The implementation of optimal spraying techniques combined with the correct assessment of the mechanical properties of fruits is important in agricultural practice, where it is crucial to obtain high-quality blueberries after harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime spraying increased blueberry fruit size, especially at 0.2 MPa with AIXR nozzles.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Treatment
lime sprayinge0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.2 MPae0
Comparator
control groupe0

Verbatim

e0

“lime spraying induces a significant effect on the increase in fruit size, especially at a pressure of 0.2 MPa and with AIXR nozzles compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit firmness was approximately 80% higher than detachment force.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Outcome
fruit firmness (Fp)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
approximately 80%e0
Comparator
detachment force (Fpf)e0

Verbatim

e0

“fruit firmness (Fp) was approximately 80% higher than the detachment force (Fpf)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peak pressures were more than twice as high.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Outcome
peak pressurese0
Direction
more than twice as highe0
Value
more than twicee0

Verbatim

e0

“with peak pressures more than twice as high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Handpicking was judged to pose minimal risk of mechanical damage.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Outcome
minimal risk of mechanical damagee0

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting that handpicking poses minimal risk of mechanical damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · VacciniumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

application · yield · VacciniumResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.