- ethofumesatePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- azoxystrobinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- chloridazonPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- chlorothalonilPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- diazinonPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- difenoconazolePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- kresoxim-methylPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- metamitronPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- triflusulfuronPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- imidaclopridResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phenmediphamResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- glyphosateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- manebResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- phorateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- herbicidePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- fungicideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- insecticideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- densityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.