fungicide · Control · Beta vulgaris (beet)

Results agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 claims from these papers.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive result
Negative result or no effect
Citation, pointing to the cited paper
Citation across the two sides
Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 4

Improving the Cercospora Leaf Spot Management Model for Sugar Beet in Minnesota and North Dakota · 2007
- positive
  Fungicide applications based on the Cercospora management model gave similar, effective disease control compared with calendar-based applications in sugar beet.
  compared with calendar-based applications
Early detection and quantification of Ramularia beticola in sugar beets using spore traps and real-time PCR · 2012
- positive
  Pre-symptom fungicide treatment yielded more efficient control of fungal diseases in preliminary field trials.
Control of Rhizoctonia solani in Sugar Beet and Effect of Fungicide Application and Plant Cultivar on Inoculum Potential in the Soil · 2017
- positive
  The azoxystrobin-difenoconazole mixture and azoxystrobin alone had similar efficacy.
  compared with a fungicide containing only azoxystrobin
Timing of fungicide application against Cercospora leaf spot disease based on aerial spore dispersal of Cercospora beticola in sugar beet · 2023
- positive
  Fungicide application based on spore flight achieved sufficient control success in on-farm trials.
- positive
  A second fungicide application based on spore flight detection achieved an efficacy similar to two fungicide applications based on incidence threshold.
  compared with two fungicide applications based on DI
- negative
  A single fungicide application at the onset of spore flight did not provide sufficient control of sugar yield loss in sugar beet.
- no effect
  Fungicide application based on spore flight did not improve disease control compared with the incidence threshold in sugar beet.
  compared with usage of DI as threshold

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

fungicide · Control · Beta vulgaris (beet)

How these papers cite each other

Papers reporting a positive result 4

fungicide on Beta vulgaris (beet) against other targets

fungicide · control on other organisms