fertilization · Disease · Beta vulgaris (beet)
12 claims from these papers.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 8
The effects of magnesium fertilizers on yield and chemical composition of sugar beet · 1969
- positive
Effect of Calcium on The Growth and Ion Uptake in NaCl-Stressed Plants · 1995
- positive
Effect of Poultry Compost on Productivity and Quality of Beets · 1998
- positive
Base cations ameliorate Zn toxicity but not Cu toxicity in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) · 1999
- positive
- no effect
Brief report of bio potash fertilizer sprayed in sugarbeet · 2000
- positive
- positive
- positive
A study of the effect of Cercospora leaf spot at different cultivars and fertilization level · 2021
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3
Polymyxa betae zoospores as vectors of beet necrotic yellow vein furovirus1 · 1989
- no effect
Factors affecting the control of Pythium ultimum damping‐off of sugar beet by Pythium oligandrum · 1998
- negative
Effect of agrotechnical and chemical practices on Fusarium rot root in sugar beet production · 2020
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.