Abstract
Results of comparation tests with biopotash fertilizer have shown that root yield, sugar content, sugar yield increased 14%, 0.5% and 15%, root rot has decreased 10.8% than CK, it is a economical and pratice measure.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Biopotash raised root yield by 14% relative to CK.
- Taxon
- sugarbeet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- biopotash fertilizere1
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 14%e0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root yield, sugar content, sugar yield increased 14%, 0.5% and 15%, root rot has decreased 10.8% than CK”
t0“sugarbeet”
e1“biopotash fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Biopotash raised sugar content by 0.5% relative to CK.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- biopotash fertilizere1
- Outcome
- sugar contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0.5%e0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root yield, sugar content, sugar yield increased 14%, 0.5% and 15%, root rot has decreased 10.8% than CK”
t0“sugarbeet”
e1“biopotash fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Biopotash raised sugar yield by 15% relative to CK.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- biopotash fertilizere1
- Outcome
- sugar yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 15%e0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root yield, sugar content, sugar yield increased 14%, 0.5% and 15%, root rot has decreased 10.8% than CK”
t0“sugarbeet”
e1“biopotash fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Biopotash reduced root rot by 10.8% relative to CK.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- biopotash fertilizere1
- Outcome
- root rote0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 10.8%e0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root rot has decreased 10.8% than CK”
t0“sugarbeet”
e1“biopotash fertilizer”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
101 papers more in this group
See all 105 papers →fertilization · disease · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
236 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
263 papers more in this group
See all 267 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.