- calcium atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- 1-naphthaleneacetic acidPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- copper atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- 2,4-DResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropaneResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- iron atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- magnesium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sucroseResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 1-methylcyclopropeneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- adjuvantResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- aldicarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- beta-caroteneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- carbofuranResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- etheneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- methanolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- oxamylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- oxytetracyclineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults differ21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
- fertilizationPositive and negative results26 papers: 19 positive, 7 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results17 papers: 10 positive, 7 negative or no effect
- pruningPositive and negative results17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- potassiumPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- intercroppingPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- shadePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- cover cropPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- in vitroPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- classPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- cultivation systemPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- herbicidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- pollinationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- phosphorusResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mulchingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- biocontrolResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- climate siteResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- micronutrientResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- co2Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- graftingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- insecticideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- limeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.