application · Yield · Citrus
22 claims from these papers.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 11
- positive
- positive
Control of citrus nematode Tylenchulus semipenetrans on fine-textured soil with DBCP and oxamyl. · 1977
- positive
- positive
NOVEL USAGE OF 2,4-D TO INCREASE CITRUS FRUIT QUALITY · 2013
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Is Area-Wide Pest Management Useful? The Case of Citrus Greening · 2017
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- no effect
Evaluation of various fertilizer products for improved performance of HLB-affected citrus trees · 2025
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 5
Foliar‐Applied Nitrogen for Citrus Fertilization · 1974
- no effect
- negative
Effects of Abscisic Acid Injection on Sugar and Organic Acid Contents of Citrus Fruit. · 1995
- negative
- no effect
Sensitivity of Zasmidium citri-griseum to Fenbuconazole and Control of Citrus Greasy Spot in Panama · 2020
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.