Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Citrus blocks in an area with higher participation in coordinated sprays had 28% higher yields in 2012/13 than blocks under the same management in an area with lower participation.

A claim from Is Area-Wide Pest Management Useful? The Case of Citrus Greening · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citrus blocks in an area with higher participation in coordinated sprays had 28% higher yields in 2012/13 than blocks under the same management in an area with lower participation.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Treatment
higher participation in coordinated sprayse1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Value
28%e1
Comparator
blocks under the same management but located in an area with lower participatione1
Setting
2012/13e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“We found that yields of blocks located in an area with higher participation in coordinated sprays were 28%, 73% and 98% percent higher in 2012/13, 2013/14, and 2014/15, respectively, compared to the yields of blocks under the same management but located in an area with lower participation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–706
t0

“Is Area-Wide Pest Management Useful? The Case of Citrus Greening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64

Title

Is Area-Wide Pest Management Useful? The Case of Citrus Greening

Ariel Singerman; Sergio H. Lence; Pilar Useche Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) 2017

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-2aa0e08e5ee6fdaec5f4ded330b025ee9f53d2c5803304837f6ffb762fff450a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

application · yield · CitrusPositive and negative results

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.