application · Quality: general · Citrus

Positive and negative results10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect19401960198020002020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 8

  1. The Effects of Tillage, Non-Tillage and Nitrogen on Yield and Fruit Composition of Citrus · 1968

  2. Control of Tylenchulus semipenetrans on Citrus With Aldicarb, Oxamyl, and DBCP. · 1979

  3. NUTRITION MANAGEMENT IN CITRUS: EFFECT OF MULTINUTRIENTS FOLIAR FEEDING ON THE YIELD OF KINNOW AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS · 2010

  4. Mechanism of fungal inhibition activity of Nα‐lauroyl‐L‐arginine ethyl ester (LAE) and potential in control of Penicillium expansum on postharvest citrus ‘Benimadonna’ (Citrus reticulata × Citrus sinensis) · 2022

  5. Fixed Spraying Systems Application in Citrus Orchards: Nozzle Type and Nozzle Position Effects on Droplet Deposition and Pest Control · 2023

  6. Evaluation of tree‐injected oxytetracycline and antisense oligonucleotides targeting Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in citrus · 2024

  7. Managing endemic huanglongbing in commercial citrus production through vascular delivery of oxytetracycline · 2025

  8. Evaluation of various fertilizer products for improved performance of HLB-affected citrus trees · 2025

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2

  1. The Use of Oil Spray on Citrus Trees · 1926

  2. The Use of Oil Sprays on Citrus During 1926 · 1928

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

application on Citrus against other targets

application · quality: general on other organisms