application · Quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)
22 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 19
The effect of Concentration of Pepper Oleorecin Solution On Rice Quality During Storage) · 1987
- positive
- no effect
Influence of foliar fertilization on quality of rice · 2001
- positive
Application Effect of Paclobtrazol in Seed Production of Hybrid Rice · 2005
- positive
- positive
Summary on Experiment of Applying Seedling-Strengthening Foliar Spray on Rice Seedling Bed · 2007
- positive
- positive
VACUUM PRESSURE INFLUENCE ON WATER UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF RICE GRAIN DURING SOAKING · 2011
- positive
Effects of Cultivation in Paddy-field or Upland and Different Chemical Regulators on Quality of Rice · 2012
- positive
- positive
Rice seeds yield and quality according to fertilization · 2017
- positive
Modification of dry grain processing for rice nutrition produced · 2018
- positive
Effect of Parboiling Conditions on Physical and Cooking Quality of Selected Rice Varieties · 2020
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.