application · Quality: general · Zea mays (maize)

Positive and negative results29 papers: 23 positive, 6 negative or no effect

31 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive result
Negative result or no effect
Citation, pointing to the cited paper
Citation across the two sides
Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 23

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 6

Optimizing Nitrogen and Phosphor Use Efficiencies from Liquid Manure by Slurry Injection to Reduce Environmental Pollution · 2015
- no effect
  Slurry injection showed no significant quality difference from broadcast application with starter fertilizer.
  compared with slurry broadcast application with starter fertilizerNo difference from an alternative treatment
Potential of manure injection to increase N and P use efficiencies in maize · 2016
- no effect
  Harvest quality did not differ between broadcast and injection treatments.
  compared with BCNo difference from an alternative treatment
Sanitary and physiological quality of ‘purple’ corn (Zea mays L.) seeds submitted to thermotherapy · 2019
- no effect
  Heat treatment at 60 °C for 1 and 2 minutes did not impair the physiological quality of corn seeds.
Benefits and tradeoffs of reduced tillage and manure application methods in a Zea mays silage system · 2020
- no effect
  Manure injection did not increase yield or crop quality relative to broadcast application.
  compared with broadcast applicationNo difference from an alternative treatment
Influence of manure injection versus surface application on corn for silage and winter rye yield, quality, phosphorus balance and soil test phosphorus · 2024
- no effect
  Silage corn yield and quality were similar under injection and surface application.
  compared with surface application of manureNo difference from an alternative treatment
Study on the Enhancement of Forage Quality of Maize through Nano Urea · 2024
- no effect
  Fodder quality with 100% RDN and 2% urea spray was on par with 100% RDN and 0.4% nano urea spray.
  compared with 100% recommended dose of N + Nano urea @ 0.4% sprayNo difference from an alternative treatment

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

application · Quality: general · Zea mays (maize)

How these papers cite each other

Papers reporting a positive result 23

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 6

application on Zea mays (maize) against other targets

application · quality: general on other organisms