Quality: general · Zea mays (maize)

57 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. Zea mays subsp. maysPositive and negative results8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  2. Glycine maxPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  3. Azospirillum brasilensePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. zinc atomResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. Vigna unguiculataResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. amino acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. molassesResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. zinc sulfateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. boron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. glyphosateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  12. iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. kinetinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. propionic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. fertilizationPositive and negative results103 papers: 86 positive, 17 negative or no effect
  17. nitrogenPositive and negative results44 papers: 33 positive, 11 negative or no effect
  18. applicationPositive and negative results29 papers: 23 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  19. inoculationPositive and negative results25 papers: 20 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  20. storagePositive and negative results23 papers: 17 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  21. tillagePositive and negative results18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  22. irrigationPositive and negative results17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  23. processingPositive and negative results15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  24. phosphorusPositive and negative results13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  25. sowing timePositive and negative results13 papers: 3 positive, 10 negative or no effect
  26. densityPositive and negative results10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  27. botanicalPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  28. intercroppingPositive and negative results9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  29. mulchingPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  30. organicPositive and negative results9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  31. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  32. seed treatmentPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  33. nanoparticlePositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  34. potassiumPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  35. coldPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  36. herbicidePositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  37. limePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  38. classPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  39. climate sitePositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  40. cover cropPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  41. droughtPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  42. pruningPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  43. rotationPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  44. fungicidePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  45. ozonePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  46. cultivation systemPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  47. salinityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  48. soilPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  49. transplantingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  50. otherResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.