application · Quality: general · Solanum tuberosum (potato)
25 claims from these papers.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 21
- positive
Effects of Seed Soaked with Manganese Sulfate on Yield and Quality of Potato · 2009
- positive
Effects of Boron Nutrition on Growth and Development,Yield and Quality of Potato · 2009
- positive
- positive
Effect of Different Chemical Control Strategies on the Control of Potato Late Blight · 2011
- positive
Control of Dry Rot Disease on Potato During Storage · 2012
- positive
The Effect of Element Boron on Potato Starch Synthesis and Accumulation · 2013
- positive
MAXIMIZING THE EFFECIENCY OF COMPOST RICE STRAW FOR POTATO PRODUCTION · 2015
- positive
- positive
RESPONSE OF POTATO PLANTS TO POTASSIUM AND MICRONUTRIENT FERTILIZATION · 2016
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- positive
The efficiency of foliar treatments of grain crops and potatoes with humic preparation Rostock · 2018
- positive
Response of Potato Plants to Sources and Rates of Potassium Fertilizer · 2018
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Agroeconomic efficiency of chemical ameliorants new forms for potato cultivation · 2022
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.