Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar vermiwash applied with chemical fertilizer improved maize growth, quality and yield compared with the control.

A claim from Vermiwash Prepared From Different Agricultural By-products Enhanced the Growth, Yield and Quality of Maize Grown under Reduced Chemical Fertilizer Use · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar vermiwash applied with chemical fertilizer improved maize growth, quality and yield compared with the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Foliar application of Vw from all sources along with chemical fertilizere1
Outcome
maize growth, quality and yielde1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Foliar application of Vw from all sources along with chemical fertilizer improved the maize growth, quality and yield as compared to that of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1250

Title

Vermiwash Prepared From Different Agricultural By-products Enhanced the Growth, Yield and Quality of Maize Grown under Reduced Chemical Fertilizer Use

Naeem Iqbal; Thieu Thi Phong Thu; Nauman Ali; et al. Romanian Agricultural Research 2025. doi:10.59665/rar4210

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-8fd4098bfb4f8be6b75059227c10f24cf5a74a176d7d0fdc2f91b17d9b3eafb4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

application · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 23 positive, 6 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 86 positive, 17 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.