indaziflam · Growth · Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass)
9 claims from these papers; 4 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Indaziflam Effect on Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L. Pers.) Shoot Growth and Root Initiation as Influenced by Soil Texture and Organic Matter (2014)
decreaseIn pure sand, indaziflam reduced shoot biomass to below 32% of untreated control at 38 DAT.
Evaluation of herbicide programs for the control of knotroot foxtail [Setaria parviflora (Poir.) Kerguélen] in bermudagrass pasture (2024)increaseSpring indaziflam increased bermudagrass biomass against the nontreated control.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
4 citations between these papers: 4 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 1
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 5
Spring Establishment of Four Warm-Season Turfgrasses After Fall Indaziflam Applications · 2013
- no effect
- negative
Preemergence Herbicides Affect Hybrid Bermudagrass Nutrient Content · 2013
- negative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
Effect of Indaziflam on Hybrid Bermudagrass Rooting · 2017
- no effect
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.