in vitro · Growth · Morus (mulberry trees)
15 claims from these papers.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 9
- positive
- positive
Plant regeneration from leaf explants of mulberry: influence of sugar, genotype and 6-benzyladenine. · 2000
- positive
Plant Regeneration from Winter Bud Cultures of Special Mulberry Germplasm Resources · 2012
- positive
- negative
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Evaluation of Suitable Medium in Certain Mulberry Varieties of M5, V1, S36, Anantha, India · 2016
- positive
Adaptation of Murbei Plant of Cultures in Vitro of Peat Soil · 2018
- positive
Optimization of in vitro culture conditions affecting propagation of mulberry plant · 2020
- positive
Cryopreservation of Mulberry (Morus spp.) Germplasm · 2020
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.