Abstract
Towards developing a rapid and reliable in vitro regeneration system for the propagation of mulberry, culture response of Morus multicaulis cv. Goshoerami and M. indica cvs. K2, RFS175 and S1, was examined. The presence of a cytokinin was essential for bud break. Thidiazuron (TDZ) at a concentration of 0.1mgl-1 was found to be more effective than BAP for bud break and shoot proliferation in M. indica cvs. RFS175 and k2, whereas 0.5mgl-1 TDZ was better than BAP in M. indica cv. S1. Although TDZ enhanced the efficiency of shoot multiplication in M. indica, 2.5mgl-1 BAP was found to be superior in the case of M. multicaulis. TDZ not only significantly reduced the days required for bud break but also increased the percentage of bud breaks and the number of shoots per explant in M. indica. In vitro rooting of Morus shoots improved significantly by adding activated charcoal to culture media. A significant increase in the percentage of rooting and a decrease in the days required for rooting were observed by using 0.05% activated charcoal in M. multicaulis cv. Goshoerami and M indica cv. S1, and 0.1% activated charcoal in M. indica cvs. K2 and RFS175. In vitro-raised plantlets were successfully acclimatized and transferred to the field.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
A cytokinin was essential for bud break.
MorusOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The presence of a cytokinin was essential for bud break.”
t0“Morus species”
Claim · model-written summary
TDZ at 0.1mgl-1 outperformed BAP for bud break and shoot proliferation in M. indica RFS175.
- Taxon
- M. indica
Morus indicae0 - Material
- RFS175e0
- Treatment
- Thidiazuron (TDZ) at a concentration of 0.1mgl-1e0
- Outcome
- bud break and shoot proliferatione0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Comparator
- BAPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Thidiazuron (TDZ) at a concentration of 0.1mgl-1 was found to be more effective than BAP for bud break and shoot proliferation in M. indica cvs. RFS175 and k2”
Claim · model-written summary
TDZ at 0.1mgl-1 outperformed BAP for bud break and shoot proliferation in M. indica k2.
- Taxon
- M. indicaMorus indicae0
- Material
- k2e0
- Treatment
- Thidiazuron (TDZ) at a concentration of 0.1mgl-1e0
- Outcome
- bud break and shoot proliferatione0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Comparator
- BAPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Thidiazuron (TDZ) at a concentration of 0.1mgl-1 was found to be more effective than BAP for bud break and shoot proliferation in M. indica cvs. RFS175 and k2”
Claim · model-written summary
TDZ at 0.5mgl-1 outperformed BAP in M. indica S1.
- Taxon
- M. indicaMorus indicae0
- Material
- S1e0
- Treatment
- 0.5mgl-1 TDZe0
- Outcome
- bettere0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- BAPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“0.5mgl-1 TDZ was better than BAP in M. indica cv. S1.”
Claim · model-written summary
BAP at 2.5mgl-1 was superior for shoot multiplication in M. multicaulis.
- Taxon
- M. multicaulis
Morus alba var. multicaulise0 - Treatment
- 2.5mgl-1 BAPe0
- Outcome
- shoot multiplicatione1
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- TDZe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“2.5mgl-1 BAP was found to be superior in the case of M. multicaulis.”
e1“Although TDZ enhanced the efficiency of shoot multiplication in M. indica, 2.5mgl-1 BAP was found to be superior in the case of M. multicaulis.”
Claim · model-written summary
TDZ significantly reduced time to bud break in M. indica.
- Taxon
- M. indicaMorus indicae0
- Treatment
- TDZe0
- Outcome
- days required for bud breake0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TDZ not only significantly reduced the days required for bud break but also increased the percentage of bud breaks and the number of shoots per explant in M. indica.”
Claim · model-written summary
TDZ increased the percentage of bud breaks in M. indica.
- Taxon
- M. indicaMorus indicae0
- Treatment
- TDZe0
- Outcome
- percentage of bud breakse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TDZ not only significantly reduced the days required for bud break but also increased the percentage of bud breaks and the number of shoots per explant in M. indica.”
Claim · model-written summary
TDZ increased shoots per explant in M. indica.
- Taxon
- M. indicaMorus indicae0
- Treatment
- TDZe0
- Outcome
- number of shoots per explante0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TDZ not only significantly reduced the days required for bud break but also increased the percentage of bud breaks and the number of shoots per explant in M. indica.”
Claim · model-written summary
Activated charcoal improved in vitro rooting of Morus shoots.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In vitro rooting of Morus shoots improved significantly by adding activated charcoal to culture media.”
Claim · model-written summary
0.05% activated charcoal increased rooting percentage in M. multicaulis Goshoerami.
- Taxon
- M. multicaulisMorus alba var. multicaulise0
- Material
- Goshoeramie0
- Treatment
- 0.05% activated charcoale0
- Outcome
- percentage of rootinge0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A significant increase in the percentage of rooting and a decrease in the days required for rooting were observed by using 0.05% activated charcoal in M. multicaulis cv. Goshoerami and M indica cv. S1, and 0.1% activated charcoal in M. indica cvs. K2 and RFS175.”
Claim · model-written summary
0.05% activated charcoal reduced days to rooting in M. multicaulis Goshoerami.
- Taxon
- M. multicaulisMorus alba var. multicaulise0
- Material
- Goshoeramie0
- Treatment
- 0.05% activated charcoale0
- Outcome
- days required for rootinge0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A significant increase in the percentage of rooting and a decrease in the days required for rooting were observed by using 0.05% activated charcoal in M. multicaulis cv. Goshoerami and M indica cv. S1, and 0.1% activated charcoal in M. indica cvs. K2 and RFS175.”
Claim · model-written summary
0.05% activated charcoal increased rooting percentage in M indica S1.
- Taxon
- M indicaMorus indicae0
- Material
- S1e0
- Treatment
- 0.05% activated charcoale0
- Outcome
- percentage of rootinge0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A significant increase in the percentage of rooting and a decrease in the days required for rooting were observed by using 0.05% activated charcoal in M. multicaulis cv. Goshoerami and M indica cv. S1, and 0.1% activated charcoal in M. indica cvs. K2 and RFS175.”
Claim · model-written summary
0.05% activated charcoal reduced days to rooting in M indica S1.
- Taxon
- M indicaMorus indicae0
- Material
- S1e0
- Treatment
- 0.05% activated charcoale0
- Outcome
- days required for rootinge0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A significant increase in the percentage of rooting and a decrease in the days required for rooting were observed by using 0.05% activated charcoal in M. multicaulis cv. Goshoerami and M indica cv. S1, and 0.1% activated charcoal in M. indica cvs. K2 and RFS175.”
Claim · model-written summary
0.1% activated charcoal increased rooting percentage in M. indica K2.
- Taxon
- M. indicaMorus indicae0
- Material
- K2e0
- Treatment
- 0.1% activated charcoale0
- Outcome
- percentage of rootinge0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A significant increase in the percentage of rooting and a decrease in the days required for rooting were observed by using 0.05% activated charcoal in M. multicaulis cv. Goshoerami and M indica cv. S1, and 0.1% activated charcoal in M. indica cvs. K2 and RFS175.”
Claim · model-written summary
0.1% activated charcoal reduced days to rooting in M. indica K2.
- Taxon
- M. indicaMorus indicae0
- Material
- K2e0
- Treatment
- 0.1% activated charcoale0
- Outcome
- days required for rootinge0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A significant increase in the percentage of rooting and a decrease in the days required for rooting were observed by using 0.05% activated charcoal in M. multicaulis cv. Goshoerami and M indica cv. S1, and 0.1% activated charcoal in M. indica cvs. K2 and RFS175.”
Claim · model-written summary
0.1% activated charcoal increased rooting percentage in M. indica RFS175.
- Taxon
- M. indicaMorus indicae0
- Material
- RFS175e0
- Treatment
- 0.1% activated charcoale0
- Outcome
- percentage of rootinge0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A significant increase in the percentage of rooting and a decrease in the days required for rooting were observed by using 0.05% activated charcoal in M. multicaulis cv. Goshoerami and M indica cv. S1, and 0.1% activated charcoal in M. indica cvs. K2 and RFS175.”
Claim · model-written summary
0.1% activated charcoal reduced days to rooting in M. indica RFS175.
- Taxon
- M. indicaMorus indicae0
- Material
- RFS175e0
- Treatment
- 0.1% activated charcoale0
- Outcome
- days required for rootinge0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A significant increase in the percentage of rooting and a decrease in the days required for rooting were observed by using 0.05% activated charcoal in M. multicaulis cv. Goshoerami and M indica cv. S1, and 0.1% activated charcoal in M. indica cvs. K2 and RFS175.”
Claim · model-written summary
In vitro raised plantlets were acclimatized and transferred to the field.
- Outcome
- successfully acclimatized and transferred to the fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In vitro-raised plantlets were successfully acclimatized and transferred to the field.”
t0“Morus species”
The same questions in other papers
charcoal · growth · Morus alba (white mulberry)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
charcoal · growth · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Thidiazuron · growth · Morus indicaResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
N-benzyladenine · pest · Morus alba (white mulberry)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
in vitro · growth · Morus (mulberry trees)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.