Paper · 2014

An Experiment on Raising Mulberry Seedlings in Containers Using Mushroom Residue Composite Media of Different Formulae

Liu Bi

13
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Instead of using peat as organic substrate,different proportions of mushroom residue were used to prepare growth media for mulberry seedlings to investigate physical and chemical properties of the composite media and growth and development of the raised mulberry seedlings. The results showed that the mushroom residue composite media of T3, T4 and T6 formulae( volume ratio of mushroom residue,peat,vermiculite and perlite was 2∶ 1∶ 0∶ 1,3∶ 0∶ 0∶ 1,and 2∶ 0∶ 1 ∶ 1,respectively) were all superior to the correspondent peat composite media in nutrient contents such as organic matter, total nitrogen,total phosphorus,total potassium,alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen,and in physical properties such as total porosity,aeration porosity and water-holding porosity. Among the mushroom residue composite media,significant difference was observed in T6 formula medium on plant height,stem diameter,total root length,root surface area,and number of root tips,which increased by 106. 21%,80. 56%,644. 11%,1 044. 31% and 256. 75%,respectively. After 60 d of growth in T6 formula medium,the dry mass of mulberry seedling reached 0. 181 1 g per plant. These results strongly indicate that the mushroom residue composite media of rational ratio can be used to raise mulberry seedlings in containers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 mushroom residue medium was superior to corresponding peat medium in nutrient contents.

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
nutrient contentse0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
2∶ 1∶ 0∶ 1e0
Comparator
correspondent peat composite mediae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the mushroom residue composite media of T3, T4 and T6 formulae( volume ratio of mushroom residue,peat,vermiculite and perlite was 2∶ 1∶ 0∶ 1,3∶ 0∶ 0∶ 1,and 2∶ 0∶ 1 ∶ 1,respectively) were all superior to the correspondent peat composite media in nutrient contents such as organic matter, total nitrogen,total phosphorus,total potassium,alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 mushroom residue medium was superior to corresponding peat medium in nutrient contents.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
nutrient contentse0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
3∶ 0∶ 0∶ 1e0
Comparator
correspondent peat composite mediae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the mushroom residue composite media of T3, T4 and T6 formulae( volume ratio of mushroom residue,peat,vermiculite and perlite was 2∶ 1∶ 0∶ 1,3∶ 0∶ 0∶ 1,and 2∶ 0∶ 1 ∶ 1,respectively) were all superior to the correspondent peat composite media in nutrient contents such as organic matter, total nitrogen,total phosphorus,total potassium,alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 mushroom residue medium was superior to corresponding peat medium in nutrient contents.

Treatment
T6e0
Outcome
nutrient contentse0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
2∶ 0∶ 1 ∶ 1e0
Comparator
correspondent peat composite mediae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the mushroom residue composite media of T3, T4 and T6 formulae( volume ratio of mushroom residue,peat,vermiculite and perlite was 2∶ 1∶ 0∶ 1,3∶ 0∶ 0∶ 1,and 2∶ 0∶ 1 ∶ 1,respectively) were all superior to the correspondent peat composite media in nutrient contents such as organic matter, total nitrogen,total phosphorus,total potassium,alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 medium was superior to peat medium in total, aeration and water-holding porosity.

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
total porosity,aeration porosity and water-holding porositye0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
correspondent peat composite mediae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the mushroom residue composite media of T3, T4 and T6 formulae( volume ratio of mushroom residue,peat,vermiculite and perlite was 2∶ 1∶ 0∶ 1,3∶ 0∶ 0∶ 1,and 2∶ 0∶ 1 ∶ 1,respectively) were all superior to the correspondent peat composite media in nutrient contents such as organic matter, total nitrogen,total phosphorus,total potassium,alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen,and in physical properties such as total porosity,aeration porosity and water-holding porosity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 medium was superior to peat medium in total, aeration and water-holding porosity.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
total porosity,aeration porosity and water-holding porositye0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
correspondent peat composite mediae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the mushroom residue composite media of T3, T4 and T6 formulae( volume ratio of mushroom residue,peat,vermiculite and perlite was 2∶ 1∶ 0∶ 1,3∶ 0∶ 0∶ 1,and 2∶ 0∶ 1 ∶ 1,respectively) were all superior to the correspondent peat composite media in nutrient contents such as organic matter, total nitrogen,total phosphorus,total potassium,alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen,and in physical properties such as total porosity,aeration porosity and water-holding porosity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 medium was superior to peat medium in total, aeration and water-holding porosity.

Treatment
T6e0
Outcome
total porosity,aeration porosity and water-holding porositye0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
correspondent peat composite mediae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the mushroom residue composite media of T3, T4 and T6 formulae( volume ratio of mushroom residue,peat,vermiculite and perlite was 2∶ 1∶ 0∶ 1,3∶ 0∶ 0∶ 1,and 2∶ 0∶ 1 ∶ 1,respectively) were all superior to the correspondent peat composite media in nutrient contents such as organic matter, total nitrogen,total phosphorus,total potassium,alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen,and in physical properties such as total porosity,aeration porosity and water-holding porosity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 medium significantly increased mulberry plant height by 106. 21%.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
T6 formula mediume0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
106. 21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Among the mushroom residue composite media,significant difference was observed in T6 formula medium on plant height,stem diameter,total root length,root surface area,and number of root tips,which increased by 106. 21%,80. 56%,644. 11%,1 044. 31% and 256. 75%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 medium significantly increased mulberry stem diameter by 80. 56%.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
T6 formula mediume0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
80. 56%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Among the mushroom residue composite media,significant difference was observed in T6 formula medium on plant height,stem diameter,total root length,root surface area,and number of root tips,which increased by 106. 21%,80. 56%,644. 11%,1 044. 31% and 256. 75%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 medium significantly increased mulberry total root length by 644. 11%.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
T6 formula mediume0
Outcome
total root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
644. 11%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Among the mushroom residue composite media,significant difference was observed in T6 formula medium on plant height,stem diameter,total root length,root surface area,and number of root tips,which increased by 106. 21%,80. 56%,644. 11%,1 044. 31% and 256. 75%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 medium significantly increased mulberry root surface area by 1 044. 31%.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
T6 formula mediume0
Outcome
root surface areae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1 044. 31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Among the mushroom residue composite media,significant difference was observed in T6 formula medium on plant height,stem diameter,total root length,root surface area,and number of root tips,which increased by 106. 21%,80. 56%,644. 11%,1 044. 31% and 256. 75%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 medium significantly increased mulberry root tip number by 256. 75%.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
T6 formula mediume0
Outcome
number of root tipse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
256. 75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Among the mushroom residue composite media,significant difference was observed in T6 formula medium on plant height,stem diameter,total root length,root surface area,and number of root tips,which increased by 106. 21%,80. 56%,644. 11%,1 044. 31% and 256. 75%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 60 days in T6 medium, mulberry seedling dry mass reached 0. 181 1 g per plant.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
T6 formula mediume0
Outcome
dry masse0
Value
0. 181 1 g per plante0
Qualifier
After 60 d of growthe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“After 60 d of growth in T6 formula medium,the dry mass of mulberry seedling reached 0. 181 1 g per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1136 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that rationally proportioned mushroom residue media can be used for container mulberry seedlings.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Outcome
mushroom residue composite media of rational ratioe0

Verbatim

e0

“the mushroom residue composite media of rational ratio can be used to raise mulberry seedlings in containers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1282 · show in text ↑

in vitro · growth · Morus (mulberry trees)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.