chitosan · Growth · Vitis
11 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
Each paper in the lists below is placed by all its claims here taken together, positive if any claim is positive. A pair compares one claim of each paper, so a paper placed on the positive side can also report a decrease or no effect.
- Effect of Potassium Nano Fertilizer on Yield and Berry Qualities of ‘Flame Seedless’ Grapevines (2019)
increaseFoliar chitosan treatments significantly increased vegetative growth (shoot diameter and leaf area) of Flame Seedless grapevines.
Optimisation of rooting and growth of grapevine cuttings through chitosan application and substrate selection (2025)no changeChitosan did not significantly affect shoot diameter.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
2 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 9
- positive
Potential Use of Chitosan in the Control of Grapevine Trunk Diseases. · 2007
- positive
Impact of Alternative Fungicides on Grape Downy Mildew Control and Vine Growth and Development · 2015
- positive
Effect of Potassium Nano Fertilizer on Yield and Berry Qualities of ‘Flame Seedless’ Grapevines · 2019
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Deciphering Chitosan–Host Plant Interaction in Esca Disease · 2023
- positive
- positive
- positive
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.
chitosan on Vitis against other targets
chitosan · growth on other organisms
- Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)
- Zea mays (maize)
- Oryza sativa (rice)
- Malus domestica (apple)
- Hordeum vulgare (barley)
- Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)
- Triticum aestivum (wheat)
- Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)
- Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)
- Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)
- Brassica napus (oilseed rape)
- Chrysanthemum