1-methylcyclopropene · Quality: postharvest · Vitis
12 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- 1-Methylcyclopropene on Fruit Quality of Se-Enriched Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) during Shelf Life Period (2020)
decrease1-MCP application could delay the process of ripening and senescence of Se-enriched table grape.
Alternatives to SO 2 to maintain phenolic compounds and overall quality of ready‐to‐eat table grapes during long‐term storage (2023)no change1-MCP did not reduce table grape senescence during storage.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
2 citations between these papers: 1 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 6
- positive
- positive
Analysis on texture properties of treated grape fruit with 1-MCP based on TPA Test · 2011
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3
ETHYLENE IS REQUIRED FOR THE RIPENING OF GRAPE · 2005
- negative
Reciprocity between abscisic acid and ethylene at the onset of berry ripening and after harvest · 2010
- no effect
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.