Bemisia tabaci · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)

1. endosulfanPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. lambda-cyhalothrinPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. amitrazPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. buprofezinResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. thiamethoxamResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. acetamipridResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. diafenthiuronResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. imidaclopridResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. pyriproxyfenResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. flonicamidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. Beauveria bassianaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. bifenthrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. chlorpyrifosResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. clothianidinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. dinotefuranResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. methomylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. spirotetramatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. triazophosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. applicationPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. insecticidePositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
21. biocontrolPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
22. intercroppingPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
23. transgenicPositive and negative results6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect
24. irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. fertilizationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. botanicalResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. co2Results agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
28. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. trap barrierResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.