application · Bemisia tabaci · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)

Positive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect1990199520002005201020152020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 7

  1. Effect of Buprofezin on Embryo genesis and Progeny Formation of Sweet potato Whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) · 1988

  2. Evaluation of insecticides in field-control simulators and standard laboratory bioassays against resistant and susceptible Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) from Sudan · 1991

  3. Comparative toxicity of foliar and systemic applications of acetamiprid and imidacloprid against the cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) · 1998

  4. EFFECT OF Bemisia tabaci (GENN.) AND WEEDS MANAGEMENT IN CUCUMBER FIELDS ON INFESTATION WITH COTTON WHITEFLIES IN NEIGHBOURING COTTON FIELDS · 2004

  5. Management cotton whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) · 2018

  6. Evaluation of ipm modules against whitefly bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) in cotton · 2020

  7. Determination of Silicon Accumulation in Non-Bt Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Plants and Its Impact on Fecundity and Biology of Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) under Controlled Conditions · 2022

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1

  1. Aerial electrostatic‐charged sprays for deposition and efficacy against sweet potato whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) on cotton · 2009

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

application on Gossypium hirsutum (cotton) against other targets

application · Bemisia tabaci on other organisms