- calcium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- melatoninResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- gamma-aminobutyric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- prolineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- floodingPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- co2Positive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- heatPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- pruningPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- graftingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.