co2 · Physiology: osmolytes · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)

Positive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect2010201220142016201820202022
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 1

  1. Effects of CO2 Enrichment on Carbon Assimilation, Yield and Quality of Oriental Melon Cultivated in a Solar Greenhouse · 2023

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2

  1. Effects of rhizosphere CO2 concentration on plant growth and root nitrogen metabolism of muskmelon. · 2010

  2. [Effects of elevated rhizosphere CO2 concentration on the photosynthetic characteristics, yield, and quality of muskmelon]. · 2013

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

co2 on Cucumis melo (muskmelon) against other targets

co2 · physiology: osmolytes on other organisms