Nutrient: content · Cucurbita (pumpkins)

1. magnesium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. zinc atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. silicon atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. WollastoniteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. cadmium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
6. iron atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7. silicate(4-)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. fertilizationPositive and negative results10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect
9. phosphorusPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. potassiumPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. nitrogenPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. applicationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. otherResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. salinityResults agree5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect
15. irrigationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. inoculationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. mycorrhizaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.