application · Nutrient: content · Cucurbita (pumpkins)

Results agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 claims from these papers.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect200820102012201420162018202020222024
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 6

  1. EFFECT OF SOME GROWTH REGULATORS ON SQUASH GROWTH, YIELD AND CHEMICAL CONTENTS · 2007

  2. Evaluation of Acibenzolar-S-Methyl and Silicic Acid for control of Phytophthora Blight Caused by Phytophthora capsiciin Squash · 2011

  3. EFFECT OF CULTIVAR, NUMBER OF APPLICATION AND LEVELS OF SEAWEED (SEAFORCE1) ON THE QUALITY CHARACTERICTICS AND MINERAL CONTENT OF SQUASH PLANT Cucurbita pepo L. · 2012

  4. Effect of Applying Potassium Phosphite with Potassium Fulvate on Plant Growth · 2020

  5. Effect of Panchgavya on growth, yield and quality parameters of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) · 2024

  6. Foliar silicon fertilization improves physiological parameters and promotes gains in yields in pumpkin ( Cucurbita moschata L.) · 2025

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

application on Cucurbita (pumpkins) against other targets

application · nutrient: content on other organisms