application · Nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)

Positive and negative results39 papers: 38 positive, 1 negative or no effect

69 claims from these papers; 8 citations between them.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

8 citations between these papers: 8 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect20052010201520202025
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 38

  1. Iron‐Manganese Interaction in Chickpea as Affected by Foliar and Soil Application of Iron in a Calcareous Soil · 2005

  2. CHEMICAL AND SENSORY EVALUATION OF CHICKPEA AND SOYBEAN AS AFFECTED BY SOAKING, GERMINATION AND COOKING · 2005

  3. Nematicidal efficacy and persistence of carbosulfan, fenamiphos and triazophos in chickpea following seed treatment · 2008

  4. Improving reproductive efficiency of chickpea by foliar application of zinc · 2012

    cited by 4 papers here

  5. Effect of foliar and basal nourishment on nutrient contents anduptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2013

  6. Effects of Source and Method of Zinc Application on Yield, Zinc Biofortification of Grain, and Zn Uptake and Use Efficiency in Chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) · 2015

    cites 1 paper here

  7. Effects of Foliar Application of Nitrogen, Zinc and Manganese on Yield, Yield Components and Grain Quality of Chickpea in Two Growing Seasons · 2015

    cited by 1 paper here

  8. Effect of Sowing Season and Zinc Sulfate Application Methods on Quantity and Quality Characteristics of Cicer arietinum · 2015

  9. Effect of soaking and germination on proximate composition, mineral bioavailability and functional properties of chickpea flour · 2015

  10. Physiochemical and nutritional attributes of raw and soaked seeds of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes · 2016

    cited by 1 paper here

  11. Effects of zinc application strategy on zinc content and productivity of chickpea grown under zinc deficient soils · 2017

    cites 1 paper herecited by 1 paper here

  12. Effect of integrated nutrient management and drought mitigating practices on performance of rainfed chickpea (Cicer arietinum) · 2017

  13. Impacts of Foliar Application of Speciality Fertilizers on nutrient uptake of Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) · 2018

  14. Yield enhancement and biofortification of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grain with iron and zinc through foliar application of ferrous sulfate and urea · 2019

  15. Agronomic biofortification of chickpea with zinc and iron through application of zinc and urea · 2019

    cites 1 paper here

  16. Impact of Cobalt Application Methods on Chickpea Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Status of Soil · 2019

  17. Impact of biofortification of zinc and iron on their content and uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Chhattisgarh plains · 2019

  18. Effect of potassium application on growth, yield and quality of chickpea cultivars · 2019

  19. Response of Chickpea to application of Humic Acid along with Vermicompost on Uptake of Nutrients, Yield attributes and Yield · 2020

  20. Influence of Various Levels and Application Methods of Sulphur and Zinc on Nodulation, Quality and Nutrient Content of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2020

  21. Biofortification of Zn and Fe in Chickpea through Agronomic Intervention in Medium Black Soils of Karnataka · 2020

    cited by 1 paper here

  22. Agronomic Biofortification of Zinc in Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil · 2021

    cites 2 papers here

  23. Effects of Farmyard Manure and Exogenous Spray of Bio-Stimulants on Seed Quality of Kabuli Chickpea · 2021

    cites 1 paper here

  24. Iron and Zinc Bio-fortification through Agronomic Intervention in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2022

    cites 1 paper here

  25. Agronomic bio-fortification of Zn and Fe on growth, yield, micronutrient concentration and agronomic use efficiency of chickpea genotypes · 2022

  26. Effect of Liquid Organic Foliar Spray on Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Rainfed Condition · 2023

  27. Application of zinc and iron for higher productivity and agronomic use efciency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) varieties · 2023

  28. Efficacy of glycine betaine (G.B.), zinc (Zn), and boron (B) on some quantitative and qualitative characteristics of rainfed chickpea · 2024

    cites 1 paper here

  29. IMPACT OF FOLIAR SPRAY OF NPK AND GIBBERELLIC ACID ON QUALITY AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF CHICKPEA BASED INTERCROPPING SYSTEM · 2024

  30. Response of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms and Phosphorus Levels on Nutrient Availability, Uptake and Seed Yield in Inceptisol · 2024

  31. Fortification of chickpea through FE, ZN, B & MO · 2024

  32. Zinc biofortification strategies for enhancing yield and zinc uptake in chickpea varieties · 2024

  33. Impact of Organic Manures and Humic Acid on Nutrient Dynamics and Crop Performance in Pearl Millet–Chickpea Cropping System · 2024

  34. Sweet Chestnut Wood Distillate’s Role in Reducing Helicoverpa armigera Damage and Enhancing Chickpea Performance: Evidence from Field Trial · 2025

  35. Effect of sulphur and boron nutrients on Available soil nutrients status in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2025

  36. Response of Chickpea to Potassium Fertilization in Vertisols under Rainfed Agro-ecosystems · 2025

  37. AGRONOMIC BIOFORTIFICATION OF DESI CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) WITH ZINC AND IRON · 2025

  38. Influence of potassium fulvate with iron and zinc foliar nutrition on nutrient uptake in chickpea · 2025

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1

  1. Effect of foliar supplementation and nutrient management on nutrient content and nutrient uptake in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2025

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

application on Cicer arietinum (chickpea) against other targets

application · nutrient: content on other organisms