Abstract
Field experiment pertaining to response of chickpea to application of Humic Acid (HA) along with vermicompost was carried out at Organic Farming Research Institute, UAS, Raichur during 2018-19. The HA was extracted from pressmud and tested on chickpea crop through soil application and foliar spray. This field experiment was laid out in RCBD with 11 treatments comprising of 75 per cent and 100 per cent recommended dose of N and P through vermicompost ( VC) and rock phosphate (RP) along with soil application and foliar spray of humic acid. The treatments were replicated thrice. Higher seed and stover yield of chickpea (1659 & 1743.7 kg ha-1), pods per plant (77.0), 100 seed weight (24.3 g) and better uptake of major and micronutrients by seed and straw of chickpea was recorded due to application of recommended dose of N and P through VC and RP along with soil application of HA @ 5 kg ha-1 and foliar spray @ 0.25 per cent compared to other treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
The specified nutrient and humic acid treatment produced higher chickpea seed yield of 1659 kg ha-1 than other treatments.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- application of recommended dose of N and P through VC and RP along with soil application of HA @ 5 kg ha-1 and foliar spray @ 0.25 per cente1
- Outcome
- seede0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Value
- 1659e0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher seed and stover yield of chickpea (1659 & 1743.7 kg ha-1)”
e1“due to application of recommended dose of N and P through VC and RP along with soil application of HA @ 5 kg ha-1 and foliar spray @ 0.25 per cent compared to other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced higher chickpea stover yield of 1743.7 kg ha-1 than other treatments.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- application of recommended dose of N and P through VC and RP along with soil application of HA @ 5 kg ha-1 and foliar spray @ 0.25 per cente1
- Outcome
- stover yielde0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Value
- 1743.7 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher seed and stover yield of chickpea (1659 & 1743.7 kg ha-1)”
e1“due to application of recommended dose of N and P through VC and RP along with soil application of HA @ 5 kg ha-1 and foliar spray @ 0.25 per cent compared to other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced a higher 77.0 pods per chickpea plant than other treatments.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- application of recommended dose of N and P through VC and RP along with soil application of HA @ 5 kg ha-1 and foliar spray @ 0.25 per cente2
- Outcome
- pods per plante0
- Direction
- Highere1
- Value
- 77.0e0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pods per plant (77.0)”
e1“Higher seed and stover yield of chickpea”
e2“due to application of recommended dose of N and P through VC and RP along with soil application of HA @ 5 kg ha-1 and foliar spray @ 0.25 per cent compared to other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced a higher 100 seed weight of 24.3 g than other treatments.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- application of recommended dose of N and P through VC and RP along with soil application of HA @ 5 kg ha-1 and foliar spray @ 0.25 per cente2
- Outcome
- 100 seed weighte0
- Direction
- Highere1
- Value
- 24.3 ge0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“100 seed weight (24.3 g)”
e1“Higher seed and stover yield of chickpea”
e2“due to application of recommended dose of N and P through VC and RP along with soil application of HA @ 5 kg ha-1 and foliar spray @ 0.25 per cent compared to other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment improved major and micronutrient uptake in chickpea seed and straw relative to other treatments.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- application of recommended dose of N and P through VC and RP along with soil application of HA @ 5 kg ha-1 and foliar spray @ 0.25 per cente1
- Outcome
- uptake of major and micronutrients by seed and strawe0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“better uptake of major and micronutrients by seed and straw of chickpea”
e1“due to application of recommended dose of N and P through VC and RP along with soil application of HA @ 5 kg ha-1 and foliar spray @ 0.25 per cent compared to other treatments”
The same questions in other papers
other · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →phosphorus · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →application · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
164 papers more in this group
See all 168 papers →application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
173 papers more in this group
See all 177 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.