Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zinc foliar application improved seed zinc content in both zinc-deficient and sufficient chickpea seeds.

A claim from Improving reproductive efficiency of chickpea by foliar application of zinc · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc foliar application improved seed zinc content in both zinc-deficient and sufficient chickpea seeds.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Zinc foliar applicatione3
Outcome
seed zinc contente3
Direction
improvede3
Comparator
zinc-deficient seedse3
Setting
glass-house conditionse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea plants were raised in refined sand culture with deficient (0.2 µM) and sufficient (1µM) supply of zinc under glass-house conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–416
e3

“Zinc foliar application improved not only the boldness and vigor of seeds in zinc-deficient plants, but also the seed zinc content in zinc-deficient seeds as well as the sufficient ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1248

Title

Improving reproductive efficiency of chickpea by foliar application of zinc

Girish Chandra Pathak; Bhavana Gupta; Nalini Pandey Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 2012. doi:10.1590/s1677-04202012000300004

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-dd744d996c23940dcc5d9797e863850e870b4f13e24c4b36465cef3947da69fe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 38 positive, 1 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.