Abstract
The present investigation “Impact of biofortification of zinc and iron on their content and uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Chhattisgarh plains” was carried out during rabi season in 2016-17 and 2017-18 at Instructional Cum Research Farm of IGKV, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). The soil of experimental field was clayey (Vertisols) in texture, locally known as “Kanhar” which was low, medium and high in available N, P2O5 and K2O, respectively. The experiment was laid out in Split Plot Design with four replications. The experiment consists of two genotypes and six different nutrient levels treatment combinations. It was found significantly difference between both genotypes and all nutrient levels treatment. The chickpea genotype Indira chana-1was found significantly higher in Zn and Fe content and Zn and Fe uptake, seed yield, stover yield and harvest index over the genotype Vaibhav during both the years and on mean basis. Treatment RDF (20:50:20) + 0.5% ZnSO4 and 0.1% FeSO4 through foliar application in pre flowering and pod development stage recorded significantly highest in Zn and Fe content and Zn and Fe uptake seed yield, stover yielda and harvest index over all nutrient levels treatment and lowest in RDF (20:50:20) (Standard control) during both the years and on mean basis.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Indira chana-1 had higher Zn and Fe contents than Vaibhav.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Material
- Indira chana-1e0
- Outcome
- Zn and Fe contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- during both the years and on mean basise0
- Comparator
- Vaibhave0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The chickpea genotype Indira chana-1was found significantly higher in Zn and Fe content and Zn and Fe uptake, seed yield, stover yield and harvest index over the genotype Vaibhav during both the years and on mean basis”
Claim · model-written summary
Indira chana-1 had higher Zn and Fe uptake than Vaibhav.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- Indira chana-1e0
- Outcome
- Zn and Fe uptakee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- Vaibhave0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The chickpea genotype Indira chana-1was found significantly higher in Zn and Fe content and Zn and Fe uptake, seed yield, stover yield and harvest index over the genotype Vaibhav during both the years and on mean basis”
Claim · model-written summary
Indira chana-1 had higher seed yield, stover yield and harvest index than Vaibhav.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- Indira chana-1e0
- Outcome
- seed yield, stover yield and harvest indexe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- Vaibhave0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The chickpea genotype Indira chana-1was found significantly higher in Zn and Fe content and Zn and Fe uptake, seed yield, stover yield and harvest index over the genotype Vaibhav during both the years and on mean basis”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar RDF plus zinc and iron had the highest Zn and Fe content.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- RDF (20:50:20) + 0.5% ZnSO4 and 0.1% FeSO4 through foliar application in pre flowering and pod development stagee0
- Outcome
- Zn and Fe contente0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- RDF (20:50:20) (Standard control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment RDF (20:50:20) + 0.5% ZnSO4 and 0.1% FeSO4 through foliar application in pre flowering and pod development stage recorded significantly highest in Zn and Fe content and Zn and Fe uptake seed yield, stover yielda and harvest index over all nutrient levels treatment and lowest in RDF (20:50:20) (Standard control)”
t0“Impact of biofortification of zinc and iron on their content and uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Chhattisgarh plains”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar RDF plus zinc and iron had the highest Zn and Fe uptake.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- RDF (20:50:20) + 0.5% ZnSO4 and 0.1% FeSO4 through foliar application in pre flowering and pod development stagee0
- Outcome
- Zn and Fe uptakee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- RDF (20:50:20) (Standard control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment RDF (20:50:20) + 0.5% ZnSO4 and 0.1% FeSO4 through foliar application in pre flowering and pod development stage recorded significantly highest in Zn and Fe content and Zn and Fe uptake seed yield, stover yielda and harvest index over all nutrient levels treatment and lowest in RDF (20:50:20) (Standard control)”
t0“Impact of biofortification of zinc and iron on their content and uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Chhattisgarh plains”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar RDF plus zinc and iron had the highest seed yield, stover yield and harvest index.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- RDF (20:50:20) + 0.5% ZnSO4 and 0.1% FeSO4 through foliar application in pre flowering and pod development stagee0
- Outcome
- seed yield, stover yielda and harvest indexe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- RDF (20:50:20) (Standard control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment RDF (20:50:20) + 0.5% ZnSO4 and 0.1% FeSO4 through foliar application in pre flowering and pod development stage recorded significantly highest in Zn and Fe content and Zn and Fe uptake seed yield, stover yielda and harvest index over all nutrient levels treatment and lowest in RDF (20:50:20) (Standard control)”
t0“Impact of biofortification of zinc and iron on their content and uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Chhattisgarh plains”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →application · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →stage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
173 papers more in this group
See all 177 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.