Intervention effectmodel-written summary

GNG-1581 with zinc sulfate and iron sulfate application had higher zinc contents and their uptakes.

A claim from Agronomic Biofortification of Zinc and Iron on Yield Potential and Zinc Fortification in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties under Arid Western Plains Zone of Rajasthan · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GNG-1581 with zinc sulfate and iron sulfate application had higher zinc contents and their uptakes.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
GNG-1581e0
Treatment
ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 (SA) + 0.5% FeSO4 (FA)e0
Outcome
zinc contents and their uptakese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
RSG-974e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that significantly higher yield attributes and yield viz. pods plant-1 and 100-grain weight were produced under the RSG-974, while higher number of seeds pod-1 as well as seed, stover and biomass yield along with higher zinc contents and their uptakes were noticed in chickpea variety GNG-1581 under application of ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 (SA) + 0.5% FeSO4 (FA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1508

Title

Agronomic Biofortification of Zinc and Iron on Yield Potential and Zinc Fortification in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties under Arid Western Plains Zone of Rajasthan

Rekha Kharra; U.N. Shukla; B.C. Dhayal; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2022. doi:10.18805/lr-4804

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-1befdc4c7e6ec0557c1962e5fc6a8354cca7d9b9e4b76fc4fd6c158808f82b6a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

salicylic acid · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.