Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Agronomic biofortification of zinc and iron on iron fortification in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties under arid western plains zone of Rajasthan

Rekha Kharra; UN Shukla

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background: According to the World Health Organization, zinc and iron deficiencies are ranked fifth and sixth among the ten most important variables in developing countries, respectively, and eleventh among the twenty most significant factors worldwide. Iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) deficiencies in human diet are common in developing Asian nations, such as India. Therefore, the easiest and most effective method of adding zinc and iron to seeds is agronomic biofortification, which may help reduce malnutrition in developing countries like India. Methods: In the Arid Western Plains Zone of Rajasthan, a field experiment was carried out to investigate the agronomic biofortification of zinc and iron in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) types. Cultivation of two types, RSG-974 and GNG-1581, together with seven fortification methods contained different zinc and iron dosages provided under FRBD, and the study was conducted throughout the 2019-20 rabi season at the Instructional Farm, College of Agriculture, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Result: The findings showed that applying ZnSO4 @ 25 kg/ha (SA) + 0.5% FeSO4 (FA) resulted in a considerably greater seed, stover, and biomass yield. Additionally, applying FeSO4 @ 25 kg/ha (SA) + 0.5% FeSO4 (FA) to chickpea variety GNG-1581 resulted in higher iron levels and their uptakes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying ZnSO4 @ 25 kg/ha with 0.5% FeSO4 foliar spray gave greater seed, stover and biomass yield in chickpea

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
ZnSO4 @ 25 kg/ha (SA) + 0.5% FeSO4 (FA)e1
Outcome
seed, stover, and biomass yielde1
Direction
greatere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“The findings showed that applying ZnSO4 @ 25 kg/ha (SA) + 0.5% FeSO4 (FA) resulted in a considerably greater seed, stover, and biomass yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying FeSO4 to chickpea variety GNG-1581 resulted in higher iron levels and iron uptake

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
GNG-1581e2
Treatment
FeSO4 @ 25 kg/ha (SA) + 0.5% FeSO4 (FA)e2
Outcome
iron levels and their uptakese2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“applying FeSO4 @ 25 kg/ha (SA) + 0.5% FeSO4 (FA) to chickpea variety GNG-1581 resulted in higher iron levels and their uptakes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1314 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

salicylic acid · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

salicylic acid · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.