Paper · 2015 · Pakistan Journal of Botany

BIOFORTIFICATION OF IRON IN CHICKPEA BY PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA

Saira Khalid; Hafiz Naeem Asghar; M. J. Akhtar; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
53
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Iron deficiency is a major nutritional disorder being responsible to affect millions of people around the globe. Its malnutrition may be reduced through biofortification: a process to produce micronutrient enriched staple food. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can fortify iron content within edible plant tissues by enhancing its availability through various mechanisms. In a pot study, five bacterial isolates (S1, S2, S3, S4 and S5) were tested for improving plant growth and bioavailable iron (Fe) content in chickpea where Fe was applied in the form of iron sulphate solution. Results showed that inoculation with PGPR significantly enhanced the plant height, root length, root fresh and dry weights, shoot fresh and dry weights and Fe content compared to un-inoculated control plants. Application of FeSO4 significantly improved the Fe content upto 100 and 173% in grain and shoot respectively, as compared to control. Application of PGPR along with iron showed 81 and 75% increase in grain and shoot iron contents, respectively, over control. These results suggested that PGPR can help plants to uptake extra Fe from soil, if soil is supplemented with additional Fe. These findings advocate that microbial assisted biofortification in grain can alleviate micronutrient deficiency in humans especially in resource limited countries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation increased chickpea height and root length relative to uninoculated plants.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculation with PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, root lengthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
un-inoculated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with PGPR significantly enhanced the plant height, root length, root fresh and dry weights, shoot fresh and dry weights and Fe content compared to un-inoculated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation increased root and shoot fresh and dry weights.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculation with PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
root fresh and dry weights, shoot fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
un-inoculated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with PGPR significantly enhanced the plant height, root length, root fresh and dry weights, shoot fresh and dry weights and Fe content compared to un-inoculated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation increased Fe content.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculation with PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
Fe contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
un-inoculated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with PGPR significantly enhanced the plant height, root length, root fresh and dry weights, shoot fresh and dry weights and Fe content compared to un-inoculated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FeSO4 increased grain iron content by 100% versus control.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
FeSO4e0
Outcome
Fe contente0
Direction
improvede0
Value
100e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FeSO4 significantly improved the Fe content upto 100 and 173% in grain and shoot respectively, as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FeSO4 increased shoot iron content by 173% versus control.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
shoote0
Treatment
FeSO4e0
Outcome
Fe contente0
Direction
improvede0
Value
173%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FeSO4 significantly improved the Fe content upto 100 and 173% in grain and shoot respectively, as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR with iron increased grain iron content by 81% over control.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
Application of PGPR along with irone0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
grain and shoot iron contentse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
81e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of PGPR along with iron showed 81 and 75% increase in grain and shoot iron contents, respectively, over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR with iron increased shoot iron content by 75% over control.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
shoote0
Treatment
Application of PGPR along with irone0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
grain and shoot iron contentse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
75%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of PGPR along with iron showed 81 and 75% increase in grain and shoot iron contents, respectively, over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest PGPR helps plants take up extra soil iron when soil receives added iron.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soil is supplemented with additional Fee0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
uptake extra Fe from soile0
Qualifier
if soil is supplemented with additional Fee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggested that PGPR can help plants to uptake extra Fe from soil, if soil is supplemented with additional Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 57 positive, 6 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 135 positive, 17 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.