Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Chickpea nutrient uptake significantly increased under RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1.

A claim from Studies on use of Potassium and Zinc on Nutrient Uptake by Chickpea · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea nutrient uptake significantly increased under RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
Outcome
total uptake of nutrientse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total uptake of nutrients were significantly increased with application of potassium and zinc @; RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 and RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1160
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67

Title

Studies on use of Potassium and Zinc on Nutrient Uptake by Chickpea

SM Fulmali; RA Jadhav; Deshmukh Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-e1dc58eb0ad237c3b1e2e8421a289282d0048b87d34c2c20bf881486bd5bca1c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 80 positive, 1 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.