Paper · 2020 · Sustainability

Soil Fertility, N2 Fixation and Yield of Chickpea as Influenced by Long-Term Biochar Application under Mung–Chickpea Cropping System

Shadman Khan; Zahir Shah; Ishaq Ahmad Mian; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A research study was established at the research farm of the University of Agriculture, Peshawar during winter 2018–2019. Commercial biochars were given to the experimental site from 2014 to summer 2018 and received 0.95, 130 and 60 tons ha−1 of biochar by various treatments viz., (Biochar1) BC1, (Biochar2) BC2, (Biochar3) BC3 and (Biochar4) BC4, respectively. This piece of work was conducted within the same study to find the long-term influence of biochar on the fertility of the soil, fixation of N2, as well as the yie1d of chickpea under a mung–chickpea cropping system. A split plot arrangement was carried out by RCBD (Randomized Complete Block Design) to evaluate the study. Twenty-five kilograms of N ha−1 were given as a starter dosage to every plot. Phosphorous and potassium were applied at two levels (half (45:30 kg ha−1) and full (90:60 kg ha−1) recommended doses) to each of the four biochar treatments. The chickpea crop parameters measured were the numbers and masses of the nodules, N2 fixation and grain yield. Soil parameters recorded were Soil Organic Matter (SOM), total N and mineral N. The aforementioned soil parameters were recorded after harvesting. The results showed that nodulation in chickpea, grain yield and nutrient uptake were significantly enhanced by phosphorous and potassium mineral fertilizers. The application of biochar 95 tons ha−1 significantly enhanced number of nodules i-e (122), however statistically similar response in terms of nodules number was also noted with treatment of 130 tons ha−1. The results further revealed a significant difference in terms of organic matter (OM) (%) between the half and full mineral fertilizer treatments. With the application of 130 tons ha−1 of biochar, the OM enhanced from 1.67% in the control treatment, to 2.59%. However, total and mineral nitrogen were not statistically enhanced by the mineral fertilizer treatment. With regard to biochar treatments, total and mineral N enhanced when compared with the control treatment. The highest total N of 0.082% and mineral nitrogen of 73 mg kg−1 in the soil were recorded at 130 tons ha−1 of biochar, while the lowest total N (0.049%) and mineral nitrogen (54 mg kg−1) in the soil were recorded in the control treatment. The collaborative influence of mineral fertilizers and biochars was found to be generally non-significant for most of the soil and plant parameters. It could be concluded that the aforementioned parameters were greater for treatments receiving biochar at 95 tons or more per hectare over the last several years, and that the combination of lower doses of mineral fertilizers further improved the performance of biochar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus and potassium fertilizer significantly enhanced chickpea nodulation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
phosphorous and potassium mineral fertilizerse0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nodulation in chickpea, grain yield and nutrient uptake were significantly enhanced by phosphorous and potassium mineral fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus and potassium fertilizer significantly enhanced chickpea grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
phosphorous and potassium mineral fertilizerse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nodulation in chickpea, grain yield and nutrient uptake were significantly enhanced by phosphorous and potassium mineral fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus and potassium fertilizer significantly enhanced nutrient uptake.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
phosphorous and potassium mineral fertilizerse0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nodulation in chickpea, grain yield and nutrient uptake were significantly enhanced by phosphorous and potassium mineral fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 95 tons ha−1 significantly increased chickpea nodule number to 122.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
biochar 95 tons ha−1e0
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
122e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of biochar 95 tons ha−1 significantly enhanced number of nodules i-e (122)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1429 · show in text ↑
e1

“yie1d of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–539 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 130 tons ha−1 biochar treatment produced a statistically similar nodule count to 95 tons ha−1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
130 tons ha−1e0
Outcome
nodules numbere0
Direction
statistically similare0
Comparator
biochar 95 tons ha−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“statistically similar response in terms of nodules number was also noted with treatment of 130 tons ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1543 · show in text ↑
e1

“biochar 95 tons ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1378 · show in text ↑
e2

“yie1d of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–539 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Half and full mineral fertilizer treatments differed significantly in soil organic matter.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
half and full mineral fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
organic matter (OM) (%)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant difference in terms of organic matter (OM) (%) between the half and full mineral fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1690 · show in text ↑
e1

“yie1d of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 130 tons ha−1 increased soil organic matter from 1.67% to 2.59%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
130 tons ha−1 of biochare0
Outcome
OMe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
2.59%e0
Qualifier
1.67% in the control treatmente0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the application of 130 tons ha−1 of biochar, the OM enhanced from 1.67% in the control treatment, to 2.59%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1803 · show in text ↑
e1

“yie1d of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer did not significantly enhance total soil nitrogen.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
mineral fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
totale0
Direction
not statistically enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total and mineral nitrogen were not statistically enhanced by the mineral fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1908 · show in text ↑
e1

“yie1d of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer did not significantly enhance mineral soil nitrogen.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
mineral fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
mineral nitrogene0
Direction
not statistically enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total and mineral nitrogen were not statistically enhanced by the mineral fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1908 · show in text ↑
e1

“yie1d of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased total soil nitrogen versus control, peaking at 0.082% with 130 tons ha−1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
130 tons ha−1 of biochare1
Outcome
total Ne1
Direction
enhancede0
Value
0.082%e1
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total and mineral N enhanced when compared with the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2014 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest total N of 0.082% and mineral nitrogen of 73 mg kg−1 in the soil were recorded at 130 tons ha−1 of biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2016–2134 · show in text ↑
e2

“yie1d of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased mineral soil nitrogen versus control, peaking at 73 mg kg−1 with 130 tons ha−1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
130 tons ha−1 of biochare1
Outcome
mineral nitrogene1
Direction
enhancede0
Value
73 mg kg−1e1
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total and mineral N enhanced when compared with the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2014 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest total N of 0.082% and mineral nitrogen of 73 mg kg−1 in the soil were recorded at 130 tons ha−1 of biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2016–2134 · show in text ↑
e2

“yie1d of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–539 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biochar control had the lowest total soil N, 0.049%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
total Ne0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.049%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest total N (0.049%) and mineral nitrogen (54 mg kg−1) in the soil were recorded in the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2142–2254 · show in text ↑
e1

“yie1d of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–539 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biochar control had the lowest mineral soil N, 54 mg kg−1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
mineral nitrogene0
Direction
loweste0
Value
54 mg kg−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest total N (0.049%) and mineral nitrogen (54 mg kg−1) in the soil were recorded in the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2142–2254 · show in text ↑
e1

“yie1d of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–539 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and mineral fertilizer interactions were generally nonsignificant for most soil and plant parameters.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
mineral fertilizers and biocharse0
Outcome
most of the soil and plant parameterse0
Direction
non-significante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The collaborative influence of mineral fertilizers and biochars was found to be generally non-significant for most of the soil and plant parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2256–2403 · show in text ↑
e1

“yie1d of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–539 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded that multi-year biochar at 95 tons ha−1 or more increased study parameters.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
biochar at 95 tons or more per hectaree0
Outcome
aforementioned parameters were greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the aforementioned parameters were greater for treatments receiving biochar at 95 tons or more per hectare over the last several years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2432–2566 · show in text ↑
e1

“yie1d of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–539 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded that lower mineral fertilizer doses further improved biochar performance.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
lower doses of mineral fertilizerse0
Outcome
improved the performance of biochare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of lower doses of mineral fertilizers further improved the performance of biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2577–2674 · show in text ↑
e1

“yie1d of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–539 · show in text ↑

fertilization · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

48 papers: 43 positive, 5 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 80 positive, 1 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

biochar · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

potassium · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

potassium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.