Nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)

50 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. RhizobiumPositive and negative results26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. MesorhizobiumPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. zinc atomResults agree33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. sulfur atomResults agree17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. iron atomResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. zinc sulfateResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous)Results agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. boron atomResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. Rhizophagus fasciculatusResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. salicylic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. Gibberellic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. Mesorhizobium ciceriResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. boraxResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. diammonium hydrogen phosphateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. ammonium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. bentoniteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. chromium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  18. copper atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. molybdenum atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. nitric oxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. pendimethalinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. potassium nitrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. fertilizationPositive and negative results81 papers: 80 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. inoculationPositive and negative results63 papers: 57 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  25. applicationPositive and negative results39 papers: 38 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  26. phosphorusPositive and negative results38 papers: 37 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  27. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  28. herbicidePositive and negative results10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  29. tillagePositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  30. droughtPositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  31. processingPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  32. co2Positive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  33. heatPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  34. nitrogenResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. otherResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  36. potassiumResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. organicResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  38. irrigationResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  39. seed treatmentResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  40. biocharResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  41. nanoparticleResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  42. salinityResults agree6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  43. sowing timeResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  44. limeResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  45. micronutrientResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  46. stageResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  47. coldResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  48. densityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  49. intercroppingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  50. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.