heat · Quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)
15 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 2
2 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Suitability of A European Nuclear Collection of Brassica oleracea L. Landraces to Grow at High Temperatures (2013)
decreaseHigh temperature reduced total glucosinolate content.
Influence of Day Length and Temperature on the Content of Health-Related Compounds in Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) (2013)increaseLevels of total glucosinolates, d-glucose and d-fructose were elevated by high temperatures in broccoli florets.
What separates themSituation: heat · not statedCompare the two papers → - Quality parameters and antioxidant properties in organic and conventionally grown broccoli after pre‐storage hot water treatment (2012)
no changeNo differences in phenolics and antioxidant activity were attributable to heat treatment.
Heat Shock Treatments Induce the Accumulation of Phytochemicals in Kale Sprouts (2012)increaseHeat shock at 50 degrees C significantly induced the accumulation of phenolic compounds in kale sprouts.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
2 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 7
- positive
Heat Shock Treatments Induce the Accumulation of Phytochemicals in Kale Sprouts · 2012
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
- negative
- positive
- positive
- negative
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.