Nutrient: content · Fragaria ×ananassa (strawberry)

1. calcium atomPositive and negative results12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect
2. zinc atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. boron atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. calcium chloride dihydratePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. iron atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. cadmium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. molybdenum atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. salicylic acidResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. selenium atomResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. silicon atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. sodium chlorideResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
13. potassium nitrateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. AzotobacterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. ChlorellaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. calcium dichlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. zinc oxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. fertilizationPositive and negative results61 papers: 45 positive, 16 negative or no effect
19. applicationPositive and negative results20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. nitrogenPositive and negative results15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect
21. otherPositive and negative results15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect
22. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
23. co2Positive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
24. irrigationPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
25. lightPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. mulchingPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. cultivation systemPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
28. biocharPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
29. classPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. densityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
31. in vitroPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
32. ozonePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
33. inoculationResults agree16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. salinityResults agree12 papers: 0 positive, 12 negative or no effect
35. growing mediumResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. nanoparticleResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. potassiumResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. solarizationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. altitudeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
40. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
41. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
42. storageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.