application · Nutrient: content · Fragaria ×ananassa (strawberry)
27 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 19
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
- no effect
Calcium Uptake during Immersion of Strawberries in CaCl 2 Solutions · 2008
- positive
- positive
- no effect
Effects of Calcium-dipping and Hot Pretreatment on Storage of Strawberry · 2008
- positive
Mitigation of salt stress in strawberry by foliar K, Ca and Mg nutrient supply · 2009
- positive
The Influence of Ca,Zn,Fe on the Production of Strawberry and its Quality · 2009
- positive
- positive
Effect of some growth stimulants on production and quality of strawberry transplants · 2015
- positive
- positive
Foliar application of potassium-based fertilizer improves strawberry fruit quality · 2018
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Response of Strawberry Plants to Foliar Application with Seaweeds Extract and Benzylaenine · 2023
- positive
- positive
- positive
Pathways and factors in calcium uptake through the skins of strawberry fruit · 2025
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.