Paper · 2004 · TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY

Effect of Foliar Iron Applications at Different Growth Stages on Iron and Some Nutrient Concentrations in Strawberry Cultivars

İbrahim Erdal; Kahraman Kepenek; İlhan Kızılgöz

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
44
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of foliar Fe applications on leaf Fe and some nutrient (P, Ca, Mg, K, Mn and Zn) concentrations in strawberry (Fragaria vesca L.) cultivars. For this purpose, 2 forms of Fe solutions (FeSO4. 7 H2O and Fe-EDTA) containing 0.28% Fe were sprayed onto the strawberry leaves at 3 growth stages (before blooming, first blooming, full blooming). Depending on the Fe sources, Fe concentration increased after each application. Before blooming, leaf Fe concentration increased from 60 mg kg -1 (control) to 127 and 105 mg kg -1 with Fe-EDTA and FeSO4. 7 H2O, respectively. During the first blooming, leaf Fe concentration continued to increase to 139 mg kg -1 with both Fe sources. While Fe concentration was 87 mg kg -1 with the control treatment, it reached 184 mg kg -1 with Fe-EDTA and 238 mg kg -1 with FeSO4. 7 H2O application after the full blooming. While the leaf Fe and Zn concentrations increased with foliar Fe applications, leaf P, Mg and K concentrations were not affected, but Ca and Mn concentrations decreased. This indicated that the leaf Fe concentration of strawberry increased continuously with repeated foliar Fe application from both sources. Regarding leaf Fe concentrations, it was seen that the effect of FeSO4. 7 H2O on leaf Fe concentrations was higher than that of Fe-EDTA. Ozet: Bu cal›flma, yapraktan Fe uygulamas›n›n, cilek ceflitlerindeki (Fragaria vesca L.) Fe ve baz› (P, Ca, Mg, K, Mn ve Zn) besin elementi konsantrasyonlar›na etkisini araflt›rmak icin yap›lm›flt›r. Bu nedenle, cilek yapraklar›na % 0.28 Fe iceren iki Fe formu (FeSO4. 7 H2O ve Fe-EDTA) 3 farkl› donemde (ciceklenme oncesi, ilk ciceklenme, tam ciceklenme) uygulanm›flt›r. Demir uygulamalar›na bal› olarak yaprak Fe konsantrasyonlar› artm›flt›r. Ciceklenme oncesi yaprak Fe konsantrasyonu Fe- EDTA ve FeSO4. 7 H2O ile 60 mg kg -1 dan 127 ve 105 mg kg -1 'a yukselmifltir. Ilk ciceklenmede yaprak Fe konsantrasyonu artmaya devam etmifl ve 139 mg kg -1 'a ulaflm›flt›r. En yuksek Fe konsantrasyonu tam ciceklenme doneminde elde edilmifl ve kontrol uygulamas›nda 87 mg kg -1 olan Fe konsantrasyonu Fe- EDTA ve FeSO4. 7 H2O uygulamalar› ile 184 ve 238 mg kg -1 'a ulaflm›flt›r. Demir uygulamalar› ile yaprak Fe ve Zn icerikleri artarken P, Mg and K icerikleri deiflmemifl buna karfl›l›k Ca ve Mn icerikleri azalm›flt›r. Elde edilen sonuclara gore cilek yapraklar›n›n Fe icerikleri tekrarlayan yaprak uygulamalar› ile her iki Fe kayna¤›nda da surekli bir art›fl gostermifltir. Elde edilen art›fl oranlar›na gore FeSO4. 7 H2O uygulamas›n›n Fe-EDTA ya gore daha etkili olduu belirlenmifltir.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Before blooming, Fe-EDTA raised strawberry leaf Fe from 60 to 127 mg kg -1.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
Before bloominge0
Treatment
Fe-EDTAe0
Outcome
leaf Fe concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
127e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Before blooming, leaf Fe concentration increased from 60 mg kg -1 (control) to 127 and 105 mg kg -1 with Fe-EDTA and FeSO4. 7 H2O, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Foliar Iron Applications at Different Growth Stages on Iron and Some Nutrient Concentrations in Strawberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Before blooming, FeSO4. 7 H2O raised strawberry leaf Fe from 60 to 105 mg kg -1.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
Before bloominge0
Treatment
FeSO4. 7 H2Oe0
Outcome
leaf Fe concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
105 mg kg -1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Before blooming, leaf Fe concentration increased from 60 mg kg -1 (control) to 127 and 105 mg kg -1 with Fe-EDTA and FeSO4. 7 H2O, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Foliar Iron Applications at Different Growth Stages on Iron and Some Nutrient Concentrations in Strawberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At first blooming, strawberry leaf Fe rose to 139 mg kg -1 with both Fe sources.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
first bloominge0
Treatment
both Fe sourcese0
Outcome
leaf Fe concentratione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
139 mg kg -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the first blooming, leaf Fe concentration continued to increase to 139 mg kg -1 with both Fe sources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Foliar Iron Applications at Different Growth Stages on Iron and Some Nutrient Concentrations in Strawberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After full blooming, Fe-EDTA raised strawberry leaf Fe to 184 mg kg -1 versus 87 mg kg -1 in controls.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
full bloominge0
Treatment
Fe-EDTAe0
Outcome
Fe concentratione0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
184 mg kg -1e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While Fe concentration was 87 mg kg -1 with the control treatment, it reached 184 mg kg -1 with Fe-EDTA and 238 mg kg -1 with FeSO4. 7 H2O application after the full blooming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Foliar Iron Applications at Different Growth Stages on Iron and Some Nutrient Concentrations in Strawberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After full blooming, FeSO4. 7 H2O raised strawberry leaf Fe to 238 mg kg -1 versus 87 mg kg -1 in controls.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
full bloominge0
Treatment
FeSO4. 7 H2O applicatione0
Outcome
Fe concentratione0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
238 mg kg -1e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While Fe concentration was 87 mg kg -1 with the control treatment, it reached 184 mg kg -1 with Fe-EDTA and 238 mg kg -1 with FeSO4. 7 H2O application after the full blooming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Foliar Iron Applications at Different Growth Stages on Iron and Some Nutrient Concentrations in Strawberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Fe increased strawberry leaf Fe and Zn concentrations.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
foliar Fe applicationse0
Outcome
leaf Fe and Zn concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf Fe and Zn concentrations increased with foliar Fe applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Foliar Iron Applications at Different Growth Stages on Iron and Some Nutrient Concentrations in Strawberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Fe did not affect strawberry leaf P, Mg and K concentrations.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
foliar Fe applicationse1
Outcome
leaf P, Mg and K concentrationse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf P, Mg and K concentrations were not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Foliar Iron Applications at Different Growth Stages on Iron and Some Nutrient Concentrations in Strawberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf Fe and Zn concentrations increased with foliar Fe applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Fe decreased strawberry leaf Ca and Mn concentrations.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Foliar Iron Applicationst0
Outcome
Ca and Mn concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but Ca and Mn concentrations decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Foliar Iron Applications at Different Growth Stages on Iron and Some Nutrient Concentrations in Strawberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeSO4. 7 H2O had a greater effect on strawberry leaf Fe concentration than Fe-EDTA.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
FeSO4. 7 H2Oe0
Outcome
leaf Fe concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Fe-EDTAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of FeSO4. 7 H2O on leaf Fe concentrations was higher than that of Fe-EDTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Foliar Iron Applications at Different Growth Stages on Iron and Some Nutrient Concentrations in Strawberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.