calcium atom · Quality: grain · Prunus persica (peach)
5 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 2
2 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Effect of Calcium and Boron Foliar Application on Postharvest Quality of Florida Prince Peach Fruit (2014)
increaseCalcium green improved peach fruit quality and extended storage life.
Foliar Calcium Effects on Quality and Primary and Secondary Metabolites of White-Fleshed ‘Lemonato’ Peaches (2023)no changeFoliar calcium formulations did not improve fruit quality characteristics in the Lemonato clone.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Effect of Calcium and Boron Foliar Application on Postharvest Quality of Florida Prince Peach Fruit (2014)
increaseCalcium green improved peach fruit quality and extended storage life.
Influence of In-Season Foliar Calcium Sprays onFruit Quality and Surface Discoloration Incidence of Peaches andNectarines (2000)no changeFoliar calcium sprays did not increase fruit quality of peach and nectarine.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 3
Calcium Nutrition of Peach and Prune Relative to Growth, Fruiting, and Fruit Quality1,2 · 1973
- positive
Effect of Calcium and Boron Foliar Application on Postharvest Quality of Florida Prince Peach Fruit · 2014
- positive
Effects of Applying Calcium in Soil on Peach Quality of Greenhouse Nectarine During Storage Periods · 2014
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.