calcium atom · Disease · Prunus persica (peach)
14 claims from these papers.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Effects of Pre-harvest Calcium Treatment on Fruit Quality and Storage Property of Peach cv. 'Jhuang' (2009)
decreaseSpraying 1.5% calcium nitrate reduces flesh browning.
The effect of calcium chloride and calcium lactate pretreatment concentration on peach cell integrity after high‐pressure processing (2017)no changeCalcium pretreatment did not affect browning in freestone peaches.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 8
- positive
Effects of Pre-harvest Calcium Treatment on Fruit Quality and Storage Property of Peach cv. 'Jhuang' · 2009
- positive
In‐season calcium‐spray formulations improve calcium balance and fruit quality traits of peach · 2011
- positive
Effects of Calcium Chemistry on Fruit Quality and Storage Property of Nectarine · 2012
- positive
Effect of Calcium and Boron Foliar Application on Postharvest Quality of Florida Prince Peach Fruit · 2014
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effects of calcium products applications on quality and shelf life of four peach varieties · 2020
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3
Response of Peach Seedlings to Calcium Concentration in Nutrient Solution1 · 1979
- no effect
- negative
Effect of calcium and nitrogen fertilization on bacterial canker susceptibility in stone fruits · 2013
- no effect
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.