Paper · 2025 · Plant Science Today

Influence of pre-harvest application of calcium and putrescine on fruit quality of peach during storage

J Shubham; U Shweta; D C Dimri; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A study was aimed at analyzing the effect of pre-harvest sprays of calcium and putrescine on extending the shelf life and improving the fruit quality attributes of peach cv. Pratap was undertaken at G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand. Peach fruit is generally characterized by high perishability and short storage potential as fruits ripen quickly, shrivel by losing water and can be destroyed by fruit rotting microorganisms, thus rendering them unmarketable. For this, fifteen-year-old peach trees were sprayed with putrescine and calcium sprays and their combination treatments 10 days before harvesting. Fruit quality assessment such as fruit weight, physiological loss in weight (PLW), fruit shrinkage, fruit firmness, fruit decay, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), ascorbic acid content and total sugars were analyzed at harvest and after every 6 days up to 30 days of storage at controlled conditions of 4±1?C and 85± 3% relative humidity (RH). All other pre-harvest foliar sprays showed better fruit quality and storage outcomes than the control. The findings of the present investigation revealed that foliar spray of calcium nitrate at the rate of 1.0% along with the application of putrescine at the rate of 100 ppm followed by calcium nitrate at the rate of 1.0% along with the application of putrescine at the rate of 200 ppm improved the quality and storability of peach cv. Pratap. The combined treatment of putrescine and calcium enhanced firmness, TSS and total sugars and reduced weight loss, shrinkage and fruit decay percentage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest foliar sprays improved fruit quality and storage outcomes relative to control.

Treatment
pre-harvest foliar sprayse0
Outcome
fruit quality and storage outcomese0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All other pre-harvest foliar sprays showed better fruit quality and storage outcomes than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1112 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach cv. Pratap was undertaken”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate 1.0% with putrescine 100 ppm improved peach quality and storability.

Material
Pratape0
Treatment
calcium nitrate at the rate of 1.0% along with the application of putrescine at the rate of 100 ppme0
Outcome
quality and storabilitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of calcium nitrate at the rate of 1.0% along with the application of putrescine at the rate of 100 ppm followed by calcium nitrate at the rate of 1.0% along with the application of putrescine at the rate of 200 ppm improved the quality and storability of peach cv. Pratap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate 1.0% with putrescine 200 ppm improved peach quality and storability.

Material
Pratape0
Treatment
calcium nitrate at the rate of 1.0% along with the application of putrescine at the rate of 200 ppme0
Outcome
quality and storabilitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“calcium nitrate at the rate of 1.0% along with the application of putrescine at the rate of 200 ppm improved the quality and storability of peach cv. Pratap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined putrescine and calcium enhanced fruit firmness, soluble solids, and sugars.

Treatment
combined treatment of putrescine and calciume0
Outcome
firmness, TSS and total sugarse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined treatment of putrescine and calcium enhanced firmness, TSS and total sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1544 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach cv. Pratap was undertaken”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined putrescine and calcium reduced fruit weight loss, shrinkage, and decay.

Treatment
combined treatment of putrescine and calciume0
Outcome
weight loss, shrinkage and fruit decay percentagee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined treatment of putrescine and calcium enhanced firmness, TSS and total sugars and reduced weight loss, shrinkage and fruit decay percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1606 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach cv. Pratap was undertaken”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–195 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

calcium atom · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

putrescine · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

putrescine · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium nitrate · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

putrescine · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · quality: grain · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.