Paper · 2013 · Fruits

Effect of calcium and nitrogen fertilization on bacterial canker susceptibility in stone fruits

Tiesen Cao; Roger A. Duncan; Bruce C. Kirkpatrick; et al.

13
claims
15
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effect of calcium and nitrogen fertilization on bacterial canker susceptibility in stone fruits. Abstract -Introduction. Bacterial canker, caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, is a destructive disease where stone fruit trees are cultivated. The efficacy of nitrogen and calcium fertilization on bacterial canker susceptibility was evaluated in stone fruits. Materials and methods. Field experiments were conducted to study the efficacy of foliar applications of calcium nitrate, and ground fertilization with CAN-17 plus low-biuret urea foliar spray on bacterial susceptibility in 'Riegel' peach, 'French' prune and 'Nonpareil' almond growing in ring nematode-infested and nematicide-fumigated soils. Host susceptibility was evaluated by measuring the length of lesions developed following inoculation with P. syringae pv. syringae. Results and discussion. Foliar applications of Ca(NO 3 ) 2 significantly increased leaf nitrogen and bark calcium concentrations in peach trees growing in both fumigated and nonfumigated areas. Peach trees growing in nonfumigated areas developed significantly longer lesions than trees growing in fumigated areas. However, Ca(NO 3 ) 2 foliar applications had no effect in decreasing peach susceptibility to bacterial infection in both nonfumigated and fumigated areas. After inoculation, diseased prune trees developed significantly longer lesions than healthy trees. Leaf and bark calcium concentrations of diseased prune were significantly increased after Ca(NO 3 ) 2 foliar sprays, but again the treatments did not significantly affect prune susceptibility to bacterial infection. However, nitrogen fertilization with CAN-17 and urea significantly increased the bark nitrogen concentration of almond trees, and these trees had significantly smaller lesions than those not receiving nitrogen fertilization. Foliar application of calcium (Nutri-Cal) did not affect almond susceptibility to bacterial canker. Collectively, these data support the previous hypothesis that increased susceptibility of stone fruits to P. syringae pv. syringae under nematode infestation conditions is mediated by both nitrogen effects and nitrogenindependent effects, and application of ammonium nitrogen may have some beneficial effects in reducing stone fruit susceptibility to bacterial canker where ring nematode infestation prevails. USA / Prunus persica / Prunus avium / Prunus domestica / plant diseases / Pseudomonas syringae / plant nematodes / Mesocriconema xenoplax / cultivation Effet de la fertilisation calcique et azote sur la sensibilit au chancre bactrien des arbres fruitiers noyau.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate raised peach leaf nitrogen.

Treatment
Ca(NO 3 ) 2e0
Outcome
leaf nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applications of Ca(NO 3 ) 2 significantly increased leaf nitrogen and bark calcium concentrations in peach trees growing in both fumigated and nonfumigated areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate raised peach bark calcium.

Treatment
Ca(NO 3 ) 2e0
Outcome
bark calcium concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applications of Ca(NO 3 ) 2 significantly increased leaf nitrogen and bark calcium concentrations in peach trees growing in both fumigated and nonfumigated areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonfumigated peach trees had longer lesions than fumigated trees.

Treatment
nonfumigated arease0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringaePseudomonas syringae pv. syringaee1pathogen
Outcome
lesionse0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
fumigated arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae · Interactor · picture of the speciesHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Peach trees growing in nonfumigated areas developed significantly longer lesions than trees growing in fumigated areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1154 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate did not decrease peach bacterial susceptibility.

Treatment
Ca(NO 3 ) 2 foliar applicationse0
Outcome
peach susceptibility to bacterial infectione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ca(NO 3 ) 2 foliar applications had no effect in decreasing peach susceptibility to bacterial infection in both nonfumigated and fumigated areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1309 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Diseased prune trees developed longer lesions than healthy trees.

Taxon
prunee0
Outcome
lesionse0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
healthy treese0

Verbatim

e0

“After inoculation, diseased prune trees developed significantly longer lesions than healthy trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium sprays raised diseased prune leaf calcium.

Taxon
prunee0
Treatment
Ca(NO 3 ) 2 foliar sprayse0
Outcome
Leaf and bark calcium concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf and bark calcium concentrations of diseased prune were significantly increased after Ca(NO 3 ) 2 foliar sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium sprays raised diseased prune bark calcium.

Taxon
prunee0
Treatment
Ca(NO 3 ) 2 foliar sprayse0
Outcome
bark calcium concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf and bark calcium concentrations of diseased prune were significantly increased after Ca(NO 3 ) 2 foliar sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium sprays did not significantly affect prune bacterial susceptibility.

Taxon
prunee0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
prune susceptibility to bacterial infectione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the treatments did not significantly affect prune susceptibility to bacterial infection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased almond bark nitrogen.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
CAN-17 and ureae0
Outcome
bark nitrogen concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen fertilization with CAN-17 and urea significantly increased the bark nitrogen concentration of almond trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-treated almonds had smaller lesions.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise1
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
lesionse0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
those not receiving nitrogen fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these trees had significantly smaller lesions than those not receiving nitrogen fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1849 · show in text ↑
e1

“bark nitrogen concentration of almond trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1706–1749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutri-Cal did not affect almond canker susceptibility.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
calcium (Nutri-Cal)e0
Outcome
almond susceptibility to bacterial cankere0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of calcium (Nutri-Cal) did not affect almond susceptibility to bacterial canker.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–1949 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer nitrogen-dependent and independent effects under nematode infestation.

Taxon
stone fruitse0
Interactor
P. syringae pv. syringaePseudomonas syringae pv. syringaee0pathogen
Outcome
increased susceptibilitye0
Qualifier
both nitrogen effects and nitrogenindependent effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae · Interactor · picture of the speciesHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased susceptibility of stone fruits to P. syringae pv. syringae under nematode infestation conditions is mediated by both nitrogen effects and nitrogenindependent effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2012–2187 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest ammonium nitrogen may reduce canker susceptibility in infested orchards.

Taxon
stone fruite0
Treatment
ammonium nitrogene0
Outcome
reducing stone fruit susceptibility to bacterial cankere0
Qualifier
where ring nematode infestation prevailse0

Verbatim

e0

“application of ammonium nitrogen may have some beneficial effects in reducing stone fruit susceptibility to bacterial canker where ring nematode infestation prevails.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2193–2359 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Prunus dulcis (almond)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 11 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.