Paper · 2007 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Residue Levels and Storage Responses of Nectarines, Apricots, and Peaches after Dip Treatments with Fludioxonil Fungicide Mixtures

Salvatore D'Aquino; Mario Schirra; Amedeo Palma; et al.

13
claims
23
verbatim quotes
14
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Mature apricots (Prunus armeniaca), nectarines [Prunus persica var. nectarine (Ait.)], and peaches [P. persica (L.) Batsch.] were subjected to a 2 min dip treatment with warm water at 48 degrees C or with fludioxonil (FLU) at 100 mg L-1 and 20 degrees C or at 25 mg L-1 FLU and 48 degrees C and then stored at 5 degrees C and 90-95% relative humidity (RH) for 1 week plus 1 additional week at 18 degrees C and approximately 80% RH. Fruit residue uptake was determined as a function of fungicide concentration, dip temperature, treatment time (only on nectarines), and fruit storage conditions. FLU residue level was closely related to fungicide concentration and treatment temperatures and was dependent on fruit species. FLU residues showed great persistence over both storage and shelf life. Fruit dipping in water at 48 degrees C effectively reduced decay development in cvs. 'May Grand' nectarines and 'Pelese' apricots but was ineffective in cvs. 'Red Top' and 'Sun Crest' nectarines during 7 days of storage compared with nontreated fruit. Decay rates in cvs. 'Glo Haven' peaches and 'Fracasso' apricots were very low in fruit dipped in water at both 20 and 48 degrees C. Fungicide treatments at 20 and 48 degrees C resulted in the total or almost total suppression of decay in all cultivars. During shelf life, fruit became very prone to decay, averaging 25.7-100% depending on the cultivar. Fruit dipping in hot water effectively reduced decay in 'Pelese' and 'Fracasso' apricots, 'Sun Crest' peaches, and 'May Grand' nectarines as compared to control, but was ineffective in 'Glo Haven' and 'Red Top' peaches. Fungicide treatments at 20 degrees C were more effective than hot water in most cultivars. The combination of FLU with water at 48 degrees C further improved the fungicide performance. Indeed, reduced levels (a fourth) of active ingredient were required to achieve a control of decay comparable to that for treatment at 20 degrees C. Residue levels in fruit after treatment with 100 mg L-1 FLU at 20 degrees C or with 25 mg L-1 FLU at 48 degrees C averaged approximately 0.6-2 mg kg-1, which were notably lower than the maximum residue limit (5 mg kg-1) allowed in the United States for stone fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fludioxonil residue depended on fungicide concentration, treatment temperature, and fruit species.

Treatment
fungicide concentration and treatment temperaturese0
Outcome
FLU residue levele0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FLU residue level was closely related to fungicide concentration and treatment temperatures and was dependent on fruit species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nectarines, Apricots, and Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fludioxonil residues persisted during storage and shelf life.

Outcome
FLU residuese0
Qualifier
storage and shelf lifee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FLU residues showed great persistence over both storage and shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nectarines, Apricots, and Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water dipping reduced decay in May Grand nectarines and Pelese apricots during storage.

Material
'May Grand'e0
Treatment
Fruit dipping in water at 48 degrees Ce0
Outcome
decay developmente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit dipping in water at 48 degrees C effectively reduced decay development in cvs. 'May Grand' nectarines and 'Pelese' apricots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water dipping was ineffective for Red Top and Sun Crest nectarines during storage.

Material
'Red Top' and 'Sun Crest'e0
Treatment
Dip Treatmentst0
Outcome
ineffectivee0
Direction
ineffectivee0
Comparator
nontreated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was ineffective in cvs. 'Red Top' and 'Sun Crest' nectarines during 7 days of storage compared with nontreated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dip Treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glo Haven peaches and Fracasso apricots had very low decay after water dipping at both temperatures.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae0
Treatment
water at both 20 and 48 degrees Ce0
Outcome
Decay ratese0
Direction
very lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decay rates in cvs. 'Glo Haven' peaches and 'Fracasso' apricots were very low in fruit dipped in water at both 20 and 48 degrees C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide at both temperatures almost or fully suppressed decay in all cultivars.

Treatment
Fungicide treatments at 20 and 48 degrees Ce0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide treatments at 20 and 48 degrees C resulted in the total or almost total suppression of decay in all cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nectarines, Apricots, and Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shelf life decay ranged from 25.7% to 100% depending on cultivar.

Outcome
decaye0
Value
25.7-100%e0
Qualifier
depending on the cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During shelf life, fruit became very prone to decay, averaging 25.7-100% depending on the cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nectarines, Apricots, and Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water reduced shelf life decay in Pelese and Fracasso apricots, Sun Crest peaches, and May Grand nectarines.

Taxon
apricotsPrunus armeniacae0
Treatment
Fruit dipping in hot watere0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit dipping in hot water effectively reduced decay in 'Pelese' and 'Fracasso' apricots, 'Sun Crest' peaches, and 'May Grand' nectarines as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water did not reduce shelf life decay in Glo Haven and Red Top peaches.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae0
Treatment
Dip Treatmentst0
Outcome
ineffectivee0
Direction
ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was ineffective in 'Glo Haven' and 'Red Top' peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dip Treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide at 20 degrees C controlled decay better than hot water in most cultivars.

Treatment
Fungicide treatments at 20 degrees Ce0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
hot watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide treatments at 20 degrees C were more effective than hot water in most cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nectarines, Apricots, and Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining fludioxonil with water at 48 degrees C improved fungicide performance.

Treatment
combination of FLU with water at 48 degrees Ce0
Outcome
fungicide performancee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of FLU with water at 48 degrees C further improved the fungicide performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1802 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nectarines, Apricots, and Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot fludioxonil treatment required one fourth of the active ingredient for comparable decay control.

Treatment
Dip Treatmentst0
Outcome
control of decaye0
Direction
comparablee0
Value
a fourthe0
Comparator
treatment at 20 degrees Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced levels (a fourth) of active ingredient were required to achieve a control of decay comparable to that for treatment at 20 degrees C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–1951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nectarines, Apricots, and Peaches after Dip Treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fludioxonil residues after the two dip regimens averaged about 0.6 to 2 mg per kg, below the US stone fruit limit.

Outcome
Residue levelse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
0.6-2 mg kg-1e0
Qualifier
maximum residue limit (5 mg kg-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residue levels in fruit after treatment with 100 mg L-1 FLU at 20 degrees C or with 25 mg L-1 FLU at 48 degrees C averaged approximately 0.6-2 mg kg-1, which were notably lower than the maximum residue limit (5 mg kg-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1953–2172 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nectarines, Apricots, and Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–73 · show in text ↑

fludioxonil · molecular: metabolites · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · disease · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fungicide · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 11 positive, 9 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

heat · disease · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.