Paper · 2007 · FEMS Yeast Research

The strange case of a biofilm-forming strain ofPichia fermentans, which controlsMoniliniabrown rot on apple but is pathogenic on peach fruit

Sara Giobbe; Salvatore Marceddu; Barbara Scherm; et al.

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
86
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A biofilm-forming strain of Pichia fermentans proved to be most effective in controlling brown rot on apple fruit when coinoculated into artificial wounds with a phytopathogenic isolate of Monilinia fructicola. Culture filtrates and autoclaved cells had no significant influence on the disease. When sprayed onto the apple fruit surface, this yeast formed a thin biofilm but failed to colonize the underlying tissues. When inoculated into wounds artificially inflicted to peach fruit or when sprayed onto the surface of peach fruit, the same strain showed an unexpected pathogenic behaviour, causing rapid decay of fruit tissues even in the absence of M. fructicola. Both optical and scanning electron microscopy were used to evaluate the pattern of fruit tissue colonization by P. fermentans. While on apple surface and within the apple wound the antagonist retained its yeast-like shape, colonization of peach fruit tissue was always characterized by a transition from budding growth to pseudohyphal growth. These results suggest that pseudohyphal growth plays a major role in governing the potential pathogenicity of P. fermentans, further emphasizing the importance of a thorough risk assessment for the safe use of any novel biocontrol agent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pichia fermentans effectively controlled Monilinia brown rot in wounded apple fruit.

Treatment
Pichia fermentanse0
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Second interactor
Pichia fermentansPichia fermentanse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
brown rote0
Direction
controllinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A biofilm-forming strain of Pichia fermentans proved to be most effective in controlling brown rot on apple fruit when coinoculated into artificial wounds with a phytopathogenic isolate of Monilinia fructicola.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Culture filtrates did not significantly affect brown rot.

Treatment
Culture filtratese0
Outcome
the diseasee0
Direction
no significant influencee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Culture filtrates and autoclaved cells had no significant influence on the disease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Autoclaved cells did not significantly affect brown rot.

Treatment
autoclaved cellse0
Outcome
the diseasee0
Direction
no significant influencee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Culture filtrates and autoclaved cells had no significant influence on the disease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–294 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed Pichia fermentans formed a thin surface biofilm on apple fruit.

Organ / stage
fruit surfacee0
Outcome
thin biofilme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When sprayed onto the apple fruit surface, this yeast formed a thin biofilm but failed to colonize the underlying tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–417 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed Pichia fermentans failed to colonize tissues beneath the apple fruit surface.

Outcome
colonize the underlying tissuese0
Direction
failede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When sprayed onto the apple fruit surface, this yeast formed a thin biofilm but failed to colonize the underlying tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pichia fermentans caused rapid peach fruit decay after wound inoculation.

Treatment
inoculated into woundse0
Outcome
rapid decay of fruit tissuese0
Direction
causinge0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When inoculated into wounds artificially inflicted to peach fruit or when sprayed onto the surface of peach fruit, the same strain showed an unexpected pathogenic behaviour, causing rapid decay of fruit tissues even in the absence of M. fructicola.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pichia fermentans caused rapid peach fruit decay after surface spraying.

Treatment
sprayed onto the surfacee0
Outcome
rapid decay of fruit tissuese0
Direction
causinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When inoculated into wounds artificially inflicted to peach fruit or when sprayed onto the surface of peach fruit, the same strain showed an unexpected pathogenic behaviour, causing rapid decay of fruit tissues even in the absence of M. fructicola.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pichia fermentans retained a yeast-like shape on and within apple fruit wounds.

Outcome
yeast-like shapee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While on apple surface and within the apple wound the antagonist retained its yeast-like shape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–888 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach fruit colonization by Pichia fermentans involved a shift to pseudohyphal growth.

Outcome
transition from budding growth to pseudohyphal growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“colonization of peach fruit tissue was always characterized by a transition from budding growth to pseudohyphal growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1009 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest pseudohyphal growth governs Pichia fermentans pathogenic potential.

Outcome
potential pathogenicitye0
Qualifier
pseudohyphal growthe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggest that pseudohyphal growth plays a major role in governing the potential pathogenicity of P. fermentans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1133 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend thorough risk assessment before use of novel biocontrol agents.

Outcome
thorough risk assessmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“further emphasizing the importance of a thorough risk assessment for the safe use of any novel biocontrol agent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1247 · show in text ↑

mechanical · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 11 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

inoculation · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 6 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.