Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Calcium carbide artificial ripening gave a low total iron content in peach fruit compared with natural ripening.

A claim from Comparative study to evaluate the effect of calcium carbide (cac2) as an artificial ripening agent on shelf life, physio-chemical properties, iron containment and quality of prunus persica l. Batsch · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium carbide artificial ripening gave a low total iron content in peach fruit compared with natural ripening.

Treatment
calcium carbide (CaC2) as an artificial ripening agente0
Outcome
total irone6
Direction
low amounte6
Value
7.6±1.08 mg/100 g to 30.10±1.34 mg/100ge6
Qualifier
10.63±0.75 to 31.49±0.79mg/100ge6
Comparator
NRF’se6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In order to recognize the effects of calcium carbide (CaC2) as an artificial ripening agent (ARA) on shelf life and health, related physical properties of peach fruit were evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–254
e6

“low amount of total iron analyzed in ARF’s 7.6±1.08 mg/100 g to 30.10±1.34 mg/100g as compared to NRF’s 10.63±0.75 to 31.49±0.79mg/100g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1068

Title

Comparative study to evaluate the effect of calcium carbide (cac2) as an artificial ripening agent on shelf life, physio-chemical properties, iron containment and quality of prunus persica l. Batsch

Talat Mahmood; Iftekhar Saeed; Humera Anwer; et al. 2013

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-2c86f7b2cd79d4b2f9f59e456ef8352eeb116e8cc5ba6c33c06c62b645911203 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.