Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing calcium significantly increased nectarine calcium content.

A claim from Effects of calcium application on calcium content and quality of nectarine under protected culture · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing calcium significantly increased nectarine calcium content.

Treatment
calcium applicatione0
Outcome
calcium contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
within a certain range of calcium levele0
Setting
protected culturee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that within a certain range of calcium level,with the increase of calcium application,the single fruit weight,yield,calcium content,content of soluble sugars,fruit firmness and content of Vc of nectarine fruit under protected culture were significantly increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–466

Title

Effects of calcium application on calcium content and quality of nectarine under protected culture

Zhongyong Li; Dongsheng Gao; Chuang Wang; et al. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science 2010

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-6fa0eca12f46dea3650d91fde001688138971538a15688e5898473265720783c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.