Paper · 2012 · Korean Journal of Agricultural Science

Effect of preharvest aminoethoxyvinylglycine spraying time on fruit quality of 'Nagasawa Hakuho' peach (Prunus persica Batsch) during shelf-life

Mao-Hua Wang; Ug-Yong Lee; Kwang-Suk Oh; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate the effect of preharvest spray of aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) on fruit quality of 'Nagasawa Hakuho' peach (Prunus persica Batsch). The efficacy of various concentrations of AVG (75 and 150 mg/L), which inhibits the ethylene biosynthesis, was evaluated under field conditions. Treatments were performed 21, 14 and 7 days before harvest, respectively. Fruit weight, flesh firmness, soluble solids content, acidity, ethylene production, respiration rate and skin color difference were determined at harvest time and during shelf-life at $25^{\circ}C$. Results indicated that the most appropriate timing of AVG spraying was 21 days before harvest at the concentration of 75 mg/L as shown higher firmness at harvest time and lower ethylene production and respiration rate during shelf-life. Spraying of AVG during near harvest period (14 to 7 days before harvest) inhibited fruit growth slightly, independent of concentration and did not affect fruit quality in 'Nagasawa Hakuho' peach.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG at 75 mg/L sprayed 21 days before harvest gave higher fruit firmness at harvest.

Material
'Nagasawa Hakuho't0
Treatment
AVG spraying was 21 days before harvest at the concentration of 75 mg/Le0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most appropriate timing of AVG spraying was 21 days before harvest at the concentration of 75 mg/L as shown higher firmness at harvest time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Nagasawa Hakuho' peach (Prunus persica Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same AVG application lowered ethylene production during shelf life.

Material
'Nagasawa Hakuho't0
Treatment
AVG spraying was 21 days before harvest at the concentration of 75 mg/Le0
Outcome
ethylene productione0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
during shelf-lifee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AVG spraying was 21 days before harvest at the concentration of 75 mg/L as shown higher firmness at harvest time and lower ethylene production and respiration rate during shelf-life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Nagasawa Hakuho' peach (Prunus persica Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same AVG application lowered respiration rate during shelf life.

Material
'Nagasawa Hakuho't0
Treatment
AVG spraying was 21 days before harvest at the concentration of 75 mg/Le0
Outcome
respiration ratee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AVG spraying was 21 days before harvest at the concentration of 75 mg/L as shown higher firmness at harvest time and lower ethylene production and respiration rate during shelf-life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Nagasawa Hakuho' peach (Prunus persica Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG sprayed 14 to 7 days before harvest slightly inhibited fruit growth regardless of concentration.

Treatment
Spraying of AVG during near harvest period (14 to 7 days before harvest)e0
Outcome
fruit growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
independent of concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying of AVG during near harvest period (14 to 7 days before harvest) inhibited fruit growth slightly, independent of concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach (Prunus persica Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Near harvest AVG application did not affect fruit quality.

Material
'Nagasawa Hakuho'e0
Treatment
Spraying of AVG during near harvest period (14 to 7 days before harvest)e0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying of AVG during near harvest period (14 to 7 days before harvest) inhibited fruit growth slightly, independent of concentration and did not affect fruit quality in 'Nagasawa Hakuho' peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–1017 · show in text ↑

application · quality: grain · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

application · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 26 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

application · physiology: hormones · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.